Scribd
Upload
68 views

IPE Template Concept Map

Edric Fernan Gabot conducted peer evaluations of four students - Bridgette Magcale, Christian Lapada, Darlene Gregorio, and Franco Escosura - who were in his CON1-A nursing group. He rated each student in 10 competencies using a scale of 1 to 5 and provided optional remarks. The evaluations were for a concept map activity completed on September 16, 2021.

Uploaded by

edric
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
68 views

IPE Template Concept Map

Edric Fernan Gabot conducted peer evaluations of four students - Bridgette Magcale, Christian Lapada, Darlene Gregorio, and Franco Escosura - who were in his CON1-A nursing group. He rated each student in 10 competencies using a scale of 1 to 5 and provided optional remarks. The evaluations were for a concept map activity completed on September 16, 2021.

Uploaded by

edric
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

New Era University

College of Nursing

Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


Date: 09/16/2021
Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
Name of Student for Evaluation: Bridgette Magcale
Rating/Score:  50   

Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
NUMERICAL RATING

NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


L
RATING
5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision.
4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision
3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
moderately consistent manner with
frequent guidance and supervision
2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
rarely consistent manner with close
guidance and supervision
1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
even under close guidance and
supervision

Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
1. Initiative to work. /
2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
4. Submits work on time. /
5. Submits quality work. /
6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
7. Relates well with peers. /
8. Able to share ideas. /
9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
10. Participates actively in group activities. /
Remarks:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

______________________________
Student’s Signature
New Era University
College of Nursing

Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


Date: 09/16/2021
Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
Name of Student for Evaluation: Christian Lapada
Rating/Score:  50   

Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
NUMERICAL RATING

NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


L
RATING
5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision.
4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision
3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
moderately consistent manner with
frequent guidance and supervision
2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
rarely consistent manner with close
guidance and supervision
1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
even under close guidance and
supervision

Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
1. Initiative to work. /
2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
4. Submits work on time. /
5. Submits quality work. /
6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
7. Relates well with peers. /
8. Able to share ideas. /
9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
10. Participates actively in group activities. /
Remarks:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

______________________________
Student’s Signature
New Era University
College of Nursing

Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


Date: 09/16/2021
Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
Name of Student for Evaluation: Darlene Gregorio
Rating/Score:   48  

Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
NUMERICAL RATING

NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


L
RATING
5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision.
4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision
3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
moderately consistent manner with
frequent guidance and supervision
2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
rarely consistent manner with close
guidance and supervision
1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
even under close guidance and
supervision

Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
1. Initiative to work. /
2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
4. Submits work on time. /
5. Submits quality work. /
6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
7. Relates well with peers. /
8. Able to share ideas. /
9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
10. Participates actively in group activities. /
Remarks:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

______________________________
Student’s Signature
New Era University
College of Nursing

Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


Date: 09/16/2021
Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
Name of Student for Evaluation: Franco Escosura
Rating/Score:   45  

Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
NUMERICAL RATING

NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


L
RATING
5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision.
4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision
3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
moderately consistent manner with
frequent guidance and supervision
2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
rarely consistent manner with close
guidance and supervision
1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
even under close guidance and
supervision

Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
1. Initiative to work. /
2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
4. Submits work on time. /
5. Submits quality work. /
6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
7. Relates well with peers. /
8. Able to share ideas. /
9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
10. Participates actively in group activities. /
Remarks:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

______________________________
Student’s Signature
New Era University
College of Nursing

Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


Date: 09/16/2021
Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
Name of Student for Evaluation: Jocelyn Goyon
Rating/Score:   46  

Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
NUMERICAL RATING

NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


L
RATING
5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision.
4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision
3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
moderately consistent manner with
frequent guidance and supervision
2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
rarely consistent manner with close
guidance and supervision
1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
even under close guidance and
supervision

Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
1. Initiative to work. /
2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
4. Submits work on time. /
5. Submits quality work. /
6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
7. Relates well with peers. /
8. Able to share ideas. /
9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
10. Participates actively in group activities. /
Remarks:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

______________________________
Student’s Signature
New Era University
College of Nursing

Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


Date: 09/16/2021
Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
Name of Student for Evaluation: Kay Inovejas
Rating/Score:   48  

Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
NUMERICAL RATING

NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


L
RATING
5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision.
4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision
3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
moderately consistent manner with
frequent guidance and supervision
2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
rarely consistent manner with close
guidance and supervision
1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
even under close guidance and
supervision

Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
1. Initiative to work. /
2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
4. Submits work on time. /
5. Submits quality work. /
6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
7. Relates well with peers. /
8. Able to share ideas. /
9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
10. Participates actively in group activities. /
Remarks:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

______________________________
Student’s Signature
New Era University
College of Nursing

Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


Date: 09/16/2021
Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
Name of Student for Evaluation: Lawrence Fong
Rating/Score:  48   

Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
NUMERICAL RATING

NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


L
RATING
5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision.
4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision
3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
moderately consistent manner with
frequent guidance and supervision
2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
rarely consistent manner with close
guidance and supervision
1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
even under close guidance and
supervision

Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
1. Initiative to work. /
2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
4. Submits work on time. /
5. Submits quality work. /
6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
7. Relates well with peers. /
8. Able to share ideas. /
9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
10. Participates actively in group activities. /
Remarks:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

______________________________
Student’s Signature
New Era University
College of Nursing

Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


Date: 09/16/2021
Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
Name of Student for Evaluation: Shane Immaculata
Rating/Score:     

Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
NUMERICAL RATING

NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


L
RATING
5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision.
4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision
3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
moderately consistent manner with
frequent guidance and supervision
2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
rarely consistent manner with close
guidance and supervision
1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
even under close guidance and
supervision

Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
1. Initiative to work. /
2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
4. Submits work on time. /
5. Submits quality work. /
6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
7. Relates well with peers. /
8. Able to share ideas. /
9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
10. Participates actively in group activities. /
Remarks:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

______________________________
Student’s Signature
New Era University
College of Nursing

Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


Date: 09/16/2021
Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
Name of Student for Evaluation: Zjhay Duque
Rating/Score:   49  

Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
NUMERICAL RATING

NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


L
RATING
5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision.
4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
consistent manner with minimal
guidance and supervision
3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
moderately consistent manner with
frequent guidance and supervision
2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
rarely consistent manner with close
guidance and supervision
1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
even under close guidance and
supervision

Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
1. Initiative to work. /
2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
4. Submits work on time. /
5. Submits quality work. /
6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
7. Relates well with peers. /
8. Able to share ideas. /
9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
10. Participates actively in group activities. /
Remarks:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

______________________________
Student’s Signature

You might also like