Farm Dams-Barry Lewis
Farm Dams-Barry Lewis
http://www.tooraj-sabzevari.blogfa.com
Construction
and Maintenance
Barry Lewis
All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and
subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, duplicating
or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Contact Landlinks Press for all
permission requests.
627.8
Available from
Landlinks Press
150 Oxford Street (PO Box 1139)
Collingwood VIC 3066
Australia
Disclaimer
This book is intended for use as a guide to owners and operators of farm dams. It
suggests prudent approaches to normal surveillance and maintenance practice
with a view to enhancing the long-term safety and survival of farm dams. It is not
intended as a source of detailed information to cover all possible eventualities. In
the event of any suspected imminent or potential failure condition, expert advice
should be sought immediately.
Barry Lewis
February, 2002
How about the many ideas and procedures that one picks up from
discussion with colleagues? After the passage of time, one can no longer
remember who originated what idea. After the passage of even more time,
it seems to me that all of the really good ideas originated with me, a
proposition that I know is indefensible.
It becomes clearer with time that nothing is new, but people forget the original
sources and whether those sources were really original or were the result of slight
modifications of other people’s ideas. It is like the wheel. Nobody knows who
conceived the idea, yet it is used universally. So, credit must be given to those who
have gone before me in this area.
My family has been supportive in assisting in many ways. My wife, Marion,
has typed and corrected a number of drafts. Richard, my son, has shown me some
of the intricacies of the computer, whilst Janette, Helen and Kenneth have done
their bit in other ways.
In the practical areas of planning, design, construction, maintenance and legal
issues of farm dams and other related areas I would like to thank all of those who
have been instrumental in the completion of this book. Some of these people (in
no particular order) are: K.D. Nelson, Dr M. Papworth, Dr S. Beavis, K. Brown,
J. McMullan, D. Plant, S. Perera, Dr I. Rutherfurd, T. Reid, K. Murley,
L. Churchward, T. Hamilton, Dr M. Hunter, N. Hunter, A. Loguisto and
A. Tseberg.
or average annual requirements for each proposed use of the dam. It is only after
these facts are established that harvesting, storing and distributing the water
resource can be planned (Lewis, 1993).
1.1.2 Water quality
In project planning the quality of water can determine success or failure of a farm
dam for several reasons. First, the quality of water available from a farm water
system will determine the use to which that water can be put, and hence govern
the overall feasibility of the system. Many natural waters have impurities that can
make them directly harmful to crops. Therefore, knowledge of the quality of the
water supply is essential.
Second, water quality is a factor in determining storage capacity. For example, if
saline water is intended for irrigation use, additional quantities of non-saline water
must be applied from time to time to avoid damage to the irrigated crops or soils.
Third, the presence of certain mineral constituents (such as calcium, potassium,
magnesium and/or sodium cations) in stored water may cause tunnel erosion in
some soil types. Therefore, the quality of water to be stored in a farm dam must
be considered in the design and construction of the impounding embankment.
Finally, overland flows mobilise and transport nutrients, fertilisers and silt
which can contaminate the dam water supply. Precautions need to be taken to
minimise the risk of this occurring, as algal blooms and weed infestation could
result (see Section 7.4.1).
When planning for farm water supply, the presence of minerals, sediments,
nutrients, agricultural chemicals, biota or bacteriological contamination needs to
be considered, according to whether the water is to be used for:
The testing of water samples to determine the presence and likely effect of these
impurities requires laboratory facilities (see Section 7.2).
i Hydrological factors
Run-off may be regarded as the residue of rainfall after losses due to interception
by vegetation, surface storage, infiltration, surface detention and waterway
detention. There is always a time lag between the beginning of rainfall and the
generation of run-off. During this time lag, rainfall is intercepted by vegetation,
infiltrates the soil, and surface depressions start to be filled. Run-off occurs when
the infiltration capacity is exceeded, or the precipitation rate exceeds the rate of
infiltration. Thus the depth of water builds up on the surface until the head is
sufficient to result in run-off. As the flow moves into defined waterways, there is
a similar build-up in the head with volume of water, and this is termed waterway
detention. The water in surface storage is eventually diverted into infiltration or
evaporation pathways (Beavis and Howden, 1996; Beavis and Lewis, 1999).
Rainfall duration, intensity, and distribution influence both the rate and
volume of run-off. Infiltration capacity normally decreases with time, so that a
short storm may not produce run-off, in contrast to a storm of the same intensity
but of long duration. However, an intense storm exceeds the infiltration capacity
by a greater margin than a gentle rain. Therefore, the total volume of run-off is
greater for an intense storm even though total precipitation is the same for the two
events. In addition, an intense storm may actually decrease the infiltration rate by
its destructive action on the structure of the soil surface. Generally, the maximum
rate and volume of run-off occur when the entire catchment contributes. However,
an intense storm on one portion of the catchment may result in a greater run-off
than a moderate storm over the entire catchment.
ii Physical factors
Physical factors affecting run-off include topography, soil type and antecedent soil
moisture conditions, catchment size, shape and orientation, and management
practice. Topographic features such as slope and the extent and number of
depressed areas influence the volume and rate of run-off. Catchments having
extensive flat or depressed areas without surface outlets have lower run-off than
areas with steep, well-defined drainage patterns. A catchment with a northerly
aspect will dry out faster than one with a southerly aspect. Soil texture, fabric, clay
mineralogy and antecedent moisture conditions have major impacts on the
infiltration rate and capacity, and thus influence run-off. Sandy soils with an open
fabric have high infiltration rates and generate less run-off than clayey soils with
a closed fabric (where intergranular spaces are smaller and there is less
connectivity between pores). Both run-off volumes and rates increase with
catchment area. However, run-off rate and volume per unit area decrease as the
area increases. Vegetation cover and management practices influence infiltration
rate by intercepting precipitation and modifying soil structure respectively.
Vegetation also retards overland flow and increases surface detention to reduce
peak run-off rates. Structural works such as dams, weirs, pipe culverts and levees
all influence run-off rates by either directing surface water into preferential flow
lines or storing water.
1.2.2 Methods of estimating catchment yield
The most readily available source of water is the surface water in rivers and lakes.
This water is usually stored in dams. In certain parts of Australia, fortunate
farmers have ‘run of the river’ schemes, that is, they do not need storages because
the flows in the rivers are so reliable that they can meet all requirements. This is
the situation in areas of consistently high rainfall, an uncommon circumstance in
Australia. It also applies to farms that draw their water from a river downstream
from a large public storage.
In the absence of a reliable flow in the river, a storage must be constructed to
meet all the water requirements for the storage period as well as evaporation and
seepage losses. The storage period is that interval during which there is no run-off
into the dam. Table 1.1 gives a ‘rule-of-thumb’ estimate of the storage period
required in areas with different average rainfall.
>650 12
450–650 18
250–449 24
<250 30–36
Source: Modified from Soil Conservation Authority, 1983.
Two methods are currently used in Australia for estimating the yield of a
catchment. One is the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA, 1969)
method of estimating daily run-off. This is based on daily rainfall records for the
district. The longer the period of record, the better the results. The other method
is based on the assumption that catchment yield is a percentage of the average
annual rainfall. Variability of rainfall in Australia limits the accuracy of
forecasting, and hence, the reliability of this method. It therefore follows that,
despite the most careful calculations, it is difficult to guarantee that a dam will
always meet requirements. However, a method of estimating the potential
catchment yield must be adopted so that a farm water supply scheme can be
planned on a reasonably sound basis. The run-off yield method was first published
by the Water Research Foundation of Australia (Burton, 1965) and has proved to
be of continued practical value in water resource management in most States.
Table 1.2 provides an estimate of yields from small natural catchments. The
reliability column relates to the number of years in a ten-year period in which the
given percentage yield will be equalled or exceeded. For irrigation and stock, a
reliability of eight years out of ten is acceptable, and for domestic schemes the aim
is nine years out of ten.
The selection of percentage yield within the given range depends on local
experience. For example, the lower limits in the yield column usually include
forests, areas of cultivation and improved pastures.
The run-off, in megalitres, from the catchment is calculated from Table 1.2 and
according to the following formula:
V=K×A×R×Y
where V = run-off yield volume (ML)
K = conversion to megalitres = 0.01
A = catchment area (hectares),
R = average annual rainfall (millimetres), and
Y = yield as percentage (using Table 1.2, and expressed as a decimal,
for example, 12.5% = 0.125; 7.5% = 0.075).
Example:
A small catchment of 50 hectares is forested and the soil is a sandy clay. It receives
an average annual rainfall of 1000 mm and has an evaporation of 1000 mm. What
would the estimated run-off yield be for a domestic and stock scheme?
K = 0.01
A = 50 ha
R = 1000 mm
Y = 10%, or 0.10 (reliability 8)
V = run-off yield volume (ML)
Run-off yield V = 0.01 × 50 × 1000 × 0.10
= 50 ML
For normal stock dams, and for the irrigation of annual pasture, an 80 per cent
reliability is generally used. An 80 per cent reliability yield means that the
catchment yield or run-off will be exceeded 80 per cent of the time, for example,
in four out of five years. If the water is for domestic use, or is to be an adequate
drought storage, a 90 per cent reliable yield should be used. Alternatively,
additional water should be stored to provide water during the critical storage
period, that is, the period of no run-off. However, in the absence of reliable data,
the ‘rule-of-thumb’ method can be applied to estimate the reliable yield, which is
defined as the percentage of the total volume of water that falls on the catchment
during the year. While it is acknowledged that this method is basic and arbitrary,
it is also apparent that it will continue to be used in small rural catchments. This
estimate is of critical importance when landholders request a storage of optimum
capacity. In this method, the percentage yield is calculated using the factors of
average rainfall and soil type, derived from Table 1.2. In those parts of southern
Victoria which are subject to prevailing westerly influences in the winter months,
10% 1000 mm
12%
800 mm
15%
600 mm
20%
25% 400 mm
30%
35%
200 mm
100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100
Yield (ML) Catchment area (ha)
Source: Beavis and Lewis, 1999.
the annual pattern of run-off, while not so sharply defined as in the north, involves
a winter season. This is when replenishment of farm storages can normally be
expected, followed by a comparatively dry summer and autumn.
It should be noted that estimations of yield from these tables are largely
tentative. They may be over-conservative in some districts and may be modified if
good evidence of their unreliability exists. Any increase in percentage run-off
should, however, be accepted with caution, bearing in mind that the values in
Table 1.2 are for 80 per cent reliability conditions and are not mean values. Their
usefulness is that they represent a ‘first-cut’ methodology in assessing water
resources in the field.
The estimation of yield volume (V) megalitres in the example can also be shown
by using Figure 1.1 once the catchment area (A) hectares, annual rainfall (R) mm and
yield as a percentage (%) in Table 1.2 has been selected. Simply place a mark on the
catchment area (ha) axis, trace up to rainfall (R), then move across to yield % that
has been obtained from Figure 1.1. Directly below is the storage volume or yield (V).
The run-off yield method can be used to take into account existing and future
land use even if the land will be periodically rotated after cropping. The end
results are not affected, particularly when irrigation areas are taken out and then
used for stock and domestic purposes. The basic criteria used are fixed and based
on catchment area (hectares), application rate (megalitres per hectare) and annual
rainfall (millimetres). The only variable is the yield (percentage). This will vary
only if the land has been subdivided for closer settlement and more intensive
farming practices. Figure 1.1 can be used to determine the run-off yield for small
catchments, given the storage capacity of an existing dam when it is full without
overtopping.
The storage design procedure should be based on the provisions of sufficient
storage capacity to meet water demands over a selected ‘critical storage period’.
Usually, in both case study areas (northern and southern Victoria) it is the period
from October to March, inclusive. This is the period without appreciable inflow
when the storage must supply all water demands and losses without
replenishment. For design of minor storages, ‘rule-of-thumb’ values of critical
storage period are useful. For the design of larger storages, the critical storage
period must be determined from an analysis of past run-off estimates. In both
cases it is necessary to calculate a quantity, and time pattern, of water use for the
critical period in order to determine the storage volume needed to meet all
demands and losses over this period.
1.2.3 How trees affect yield
The catchment for every farm dam is unique. In a small catchment, or where
rainfall is low, widespread tree cover will reduce yield. In a large catchment, or
where rainfall is high, water yield is usually high and the amount of tree cover is
less relevant. In most cases, a tree cover of approximately 5–10 per cent
comprising shelterbelts, small woodlots or scattered trees is unlikely to have any
noticeable effect on water yield. If water yield from a farm dam catchment covered
in good pasture were compared with yield from the same catchment with 5–10 per
cent of mature tree cover added, the difference in water yield would be hard to
measure. At the same time, the trees provide many other benefits to water quality,
pasture and crop production (Greening Australia, 1990).
Dams to be used for watering livestock should be spaced so that livestock will
not have to travel more than 200 m to reach them in rough, broken country, nor
more than 1000 m in smooth, relatively level areas; that is, the maximum spacing
between dams is 1 km. Forcing livestock to travel long distances for water is
detrimental to both the livestock and the grazing area. Overgrazing near water,
and unused feed far from water, are characteristics of inadequate water
distribution.
Where water must be conveyed for use elsewhere, such as for irrigation, fire
protection or stock and domestic use, dams should be located as close to the point
of use as practical. The economics of gravity flow compared with pumping must
also be considered.
Pollution of farm dam water should be avoided by selecting a site where
drainage from houses, piggeries, dairies, sewerage lines and similar areas will not
reach the dam. Where this cannot be done practically, the drainage from such
areas should be diverted from the dam.
The dam should not be located where sudden release of water due to failure of
the dam would result in loss of life, injury to persons or livestock, damage to
residences, industrial buildings, railroads or highways, or interruption of the use
or service of public utilities. Where the only suitable site presents one or more of
these hazards, a more detailed investigation should be made.
Powerlines present a hazard to people constructing, using or desilting farm
dams. Sites under such lines should be avoided. Permission from the electric
supply company is recommended before construction is commenced beneath
powerlines.
1.3.1 Choosing a dam site
When choosing a dam site (Lewis, 1995b), the following points need to be
considered:
i Storage yield from the catchment
Yield is the volume of water harvested from the dam catchment area. It depends
on rainfall, plant cover, slope, soil type, area and other factors (see Section 1.2.1).
Three questions need to be asked when selecting a dam site:
1 what is the catchment area above the dam?
2 how much water will the catchment yield?
3 would the catchment yield be substantially reduced if another dam were to be
built in the same catchment?
If most of the catchment is outside the property and is eroded, a silt trap may
have to be built. This is usually a small dam above the main storage (Figure 1.6).
Its function is to slow down the run-off so that silt is deposited before it is carried
into the main dam. Silt traps have to be cleaned out periodically.
ii Increased catchment harvest
Often dams cannot fill because the catchment area produces insufficient run-off.
The catchment, or source of water of a dam, should generate enough water each
year to fill it.
If the catchment is large enough, graded drains can be constructed to divert
run-off from adjacent areas. Hard surface areas such as roads and roofs can also
be used to increase the yield (see Section 1.2.4).
When planning to divert water a landholder should make sure it does not leave
the property in a different drainage line from its natural alignment. If it is
advantageous to do this then it would be wise to obtain permission from down-
slope neighbours and, if road works will be affected, from the municipality. The
permission for this diversion should be in writing from all parties concerned to
prevent future arguments.
In some cases, flows from the catchment are so great that there is no
economical way of constructing an in-stream dam with an adequate spillway. In
these cases consideration should be given to an off-stream storage. Where it is
anticipated that water may flow over the spillway for a prolonged period, for
example one week, problems may occur due to deterioration of the vegetation
cover on the spillway. This problem can sometimes be overcome with the
installation of a trickle pipe to carry the prolonged flow.
vi Legal considerations
Before constructing any dam across a gully or depression, it should be checked
first that it is not a legally recognised waterway, and that it does not have an
existing easement. This may be found on the land title or in the records of the local
municipality. If the gully or depression does have either or both of these
conditions, then permission must be obtained from each responsible authority,
agency, instrumentality or department. Permission should also be obtained from
any neighbours who may be affected.
In some States of Australia, the construction of a dam on a river, stream,
watercourse or waterway, is governed by common law and/or legislation. In
addition, a separate licence may be required to take and use the water that is to
be stored in the dam.
For details on owning a dam as an asset or a liability see Section 10.
Typical in-stream barrier with rock-ramp fish way, Merri River, Victoria
Source: T. O’Brien.
per cent. Therefore, the ideal site for a stock dam is where there is adequate depth
of a suitable soil. The same applies for fire fighting and domestic dams.
Where security of supply is important, two years supply of water should be
stored to guard against a drought year. In most parts of Australia loss to
evaporation over the two years can be minimised by a greater depth of storage.
The ideal site for this kind of dam is one with a good depth of suitable soil as close
as possible to where the water is to be used.
The ratio of the volume of water which can be held to the volume of the earth
excavated (m3) to form a farm dam, is one means used to compare different
storages and storage sites. This ratio is called the storage : excavation ratio (S:E).
High ratio values imply a low capital cost of storage. Many landowners seem to
have the wrong idea when looking for large storages. A common belief is that a
short, high embankment across a deep valley will store many megalitres. This may
be true, but a high bank is costly to build. Usually a long bank, which is low in
comparison to its length, will store more water for less capital outlay. The reason
for this is that when the height of bank is doubled, the cost of the dam increases
four times. However, when the length is doubled, the cost of the dam is doubled.
This last point may be disputed since evaporation losses will be very high with this
type of storage. The objection is real, but the fact is that deep, narrow valleys with
a flat floor are unusual. Furthermore, a narrow valley will not hold as much water
as can be stored over a wider area. Obviously, a one metre depth of water over a
one hectare surface area, in a narrow valley cannot possibly be equal to a one
metre depth over five hectares on a flat site.
There are many types of farm storages constructed, but the terminology in
describing them is not standardised. A selection with associated design and
construction details are listed in the following sections.
1.4.1 Gully dams
A gully dam consists of an earth embankment built across a waterway, valley,
depression or drainage line (Figure 1.2). The embankment generally incorporates
an earth spillway at one or both ends to pass surplus water. The earth spillway is
sometimes supplemented by a pipe spillway (trickle pipe), which helps protect the
earth spillway from the effects of long-term flows.
Outlet pipes (also called compensation or low level pipes) are commonly
provided through the embankment to service stock, domestic irrigation or
environmental flows.
Conditions when most used
These dams are normally built from material located in the storage area upstream
of the dam site. If possible, excavation should be above the level of the outlet from
the reservoir to maximise yield. The ideal site for a gully dam is where the sides of
a valley are close together and then widen out above the point where there is flat
ground.
If the slope of the valley floor is sufficiently flat a relatively low dam will
impound water over the natural surface, for a considerable distance upstream. An
S:E ratio of up to 10:1 can be achieved at a favourable site.
Gully storages must incorporate some means of passing flood flows. They do,
however, provide the most economical form of storage and are particularly
suitable for irrigation development as well as for stock and domestic purposes.
5 m minimum
SECTION 'AA' Core trench
Borrow
A pit
Bank A
Contour lines
Spillway
PLAN
Source: SR&WSC, 1970.
Contour Bank
lines
Borrow pit
A A
Spillway
PLAN
Source: SR&WSC, 1970.
The S:E ratio increases with diameter, ranging in practice from approximately
1.5:1 for a small tank to 4.5:1 for a large tank.
Ring tanks are used primarily for irrigation in flat terrain. They have the
advantage that inflow and outflow can be controlled without expensive spillway
provision. In pumping from streams, use can be made of catchments which might
otherwise be unavailable.
Figure 1.4 Ring tank
Full supply level
Freeboard
Bank 1 m minimum
Core trench
Core trench SECTION 'AA'
Bank
A A
Natural
surface
Borrow pit
PLAN
Core trench
Borrow pit
SECTION 'AA'
Bank
A A
Floor
B o r r o w p it
PLAN
Freeboard
Silt tank Full supply level
1 m minimum
Spillway
Bank
Berm
Inlet pipe
A A
Borrow pit
Silt tank
PLAN
Source: SR&WSC, 1970.
When the storage is gravity filled by surface run-off which contains appreciable
quantities of silt, it is desirable to divert this run-off into a small excavated silt
tank about one-tenth the size of the main storage. This is to reduce the velocity of
the incoming water so that the silt is deposited in the silt tank rather than in the
main storage. A suitable pipe connects the two tanks.
A storage collecting water from its own catchment requires a spillway, or by-
wash, to pass excess run-off. The catch drains are generally constructed to
incorporate the spillway, which must be located so that the overflow does not
damage the tank walls. A silt tank and spillway are not required for off-stream
storages that are filled by pumping or a controlled artificial channel.
Excavation tanks are generally limited to stock and domestic uses, and the
irrigation of high value crops, because of low S:E ratios and the high unit cost of
water storage. The excavated storage may require fencing to prevent fouling and
pollution by stock. Troughs supplied by windmill or pump are then provided for
stock watering.
1.4.6 Weirs
A weir is a structure which is not used to store water but to raise the upstream
water level to allow diversion into off-waterway storages or create a pump sump.
It can be constructed of earth, concrete or timber.
Conditions when most used
Small weirs are quite frequently used as farm storages, usually where most of the
water supply required is available from low flow in the waterway concerned. In
the past, these have all been hard weirs, built to resist the erosion effects of high
velocities and high-energy losses over the weir. Because of the expensive
construction materials, these weirs are located at sites with a short crest length,
where a rock bar or other feature causes a natural constriction of the stream.
A valid criticism of weirs on waterways with a low flow supply is that they may
be used to obtain an excessive share of the flow. To avoid this, all weirs require a
bed outlet, so that once the storage is used, remaining low flows can be passed to
downstream users. Operation of this is difficult to police, resulting in private weirs
generally not being favoured in major streams. However, if operated correctly, a
weir can provide useful storage to supply irrigation or stock water during periods
of insufficient low flow.
1.4.7 Off-waterway storages
Off-waterway storages are used to store water that is diverted or pumped from
groundwater, an adjacent waterway or catchment. These off-waterway storages
are usually in the form of a gully dam, hillside dam, ring tank or excavated tank.
They usually have either very little direct catchment, or none at all.
Conditions when most used
An off-waterway storage has the advantage of having fewer foundation problems
and, if the waterway has a large catchment, that it does not need an expensive
spillway.
Freeboard
Water level at full volume
1 m minimum
Evaporation loss
Seepage loss Embankment
Useable volume
Environmental reserve
During low rainfall periods, replenishment rates can be too low to replace
consumed water. Therefore, storages need to be large enough to accommodate
these periods. Dams should be able to cope with drought periods at least equal to
18 months, including two summer seasons (see Section 1.2.2).
When a pump or windmill must be used to supply dam water, it is advisable
to:
• make sure the storage is large enough to meet anticipated daily needs; and
• locate the dam in a position that allows supply to the whole farm over two
days by gravity feed, even if at reduced water pressure.
1.5.1 Evaporation losses
Evaporation can significantly reduce production. More than 40 per cent of water
can be lost by evaporation from stored water in a 12-month period in certain
locations. This loss will reduce the amount of water available for irrigation, with
possible significant production losses.
Since evaporation is often the biggest consumer of water from a dam, it must
be taken into account when choosing dam size. Evaporation will vary according
to climatic zone, time of year, dam size, dam shape and the specific location of the
dam.
A first approximation of annual loss to evaporation can be calculated from the
following relationship:
LE = 0.67 E × AF
where LE = evaporation loss (L)
E = local annual evaporation (mm)
AF = surface area of the dam at full supply level (m2)
To take an example: for a dam with a surface area of 5000 m2 (0.5 hectare)
and an annual evaporation of 1275 mm, the volume of water lost from the storage
through evaporation is estimated as:
Volume (litres)
Table 1.5 provides an estimate of how much drinking water stock will need in
a week.
25
Beef Cattle
20
15
10
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
Number of animals
Sheep 7
Cows (milking) 70
Horses 50
Pigs 25
Poultry 32 per 100
Note: Does not take into account whether or not stock are on dry pasture (see also Table 7.2).
100 60 40 20 10 100 60 40 20 10
3000 3000
Water area – m2
Water area – m2
2000 2000
0 0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Weeks to last Weeks to last
4000 Water requirement per week – m3 4000 Water requirement per week – m3
3000 3000
Water area – m2
Water area – m2
2000 2000 10
0 0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Weeks to last Weeks to last
supply scheme can alleviate such hardships. Below are some facts and some simple
tips and techniques to help plan stock water use and water conservation during a
long dry season.
Drought is a word that strikes fear into the hearts of dryland farmers across
Australia. Even in so-called ‘good’ years, you may be asking yourself, ‘Is there
going to be enough drinking water for my stock?’ and ‘How can I manage my
water in case of drought?’
To plan for drought effectively the following questions need to be addressed:
i How much water does my stock need?
ii How long will my water supplies last?
Once these two questions have been answered, it will be possible to make
informed choices about water and stock management. The first question can be
answered by referring to Section 1.5.4, whilst some rules-of-thumb approaches to
help answer the second question are shown in Figure 1.9.
The graphs in Figure 1.9 provide rough estimates of how long dam water lasts
for dams with a maximum depth of 1.0 m, 1.5 m, 2.0 m and 3.0 m, taking into
account evaporation losses. Note that if a dam is extremely silty it will reduce the
volume of water by as much as 20 per cent.
To use the graphs:
• measure the surface area of the water in the dam at the beginning of January;
• choose the graph that shows the maximum depth for the dam being assessed;
• measure across the graph horizontally to the amount of your weekly water
requirements, then draw a line to the bottom axis.
This will show the number of weeks you will have water in the dam, if no
further rain falls during that time.
Example
Maximum depth January 1: 2m
Surface area January 1: 1200 m3
Weekly water requirement: 40 m3
In this case the available water would last about 25 weeks, or until the end of
June.
Key:
kL = kilolitre
L = litre
m3 = cubic metre
m2 = square metre
mm = millimetre
m = metre
km = kilometre
If the graph shows that water supplies will be depleted before the next expected
rainfall, a number of choices are available:
• fence off springs, soaks and dams, and pipe water to covered troughs. This
helps prevent losses by evaporation and bogging by stock as they go in search
of water.
• pump water from shallow dams to one central dam to reduce evaporation
losses.
• build drains from road catchments and other hard surfaces to dams, to catch
any run-off from summer thunderstorms.
• de-sludge, deepen and/or carry out maintenance on empty dams while you
have the opportunity, and to prepare for rain when it comes again.
• plant or build shelterbelts to reduce stock water losses through perspiration.
• use pumps and pipes that best suit your needs, to reduce wastage and pumping
costs.
• if you use streams or bores for stock drinking water, check them for salinity
levels. If they are saline, clean your troughs and uncovered tanks each week as
they will corrode quickly.
B Cart water in
This is not only an expensive option, but can also be soul-destroying and time-
consuming. When looking at carting water in, consider the costs.
• Costs of carting water vary depending on whether you hire a contractor or cart
it using your own truck.
• Contract rates vary from $45 for 10 000 L (in areas where milk tankers are
used for back-loading to dairy farms) to $60 for 4500 L in areas where there
are fewer contractors or supplies are harder to obtain.
When deciding whether to cart your own water, you will need to consider
operating and labour costs (see example below).
Daily water requirement (from Tables 1.5 and 1.7, Section 1.5.4):
500 sheep × 7 L/day = 3500 L/day (770 gallons/day)
Truck operating costs: 18 km at $0.80 per km = $14.60
Labour costs: 2 hours @ $15.00 per hour = $30.00
Total cost = $44.60
This represents approximately 9 cents per sheep per day or $3 per sheep per
month.
If you decide to cart water, there are some things you can do to optimise the
use of that precious resource:
• store the water in a tank rather than a dam, if possible, to reduce losses by
seepage and evaporation.
• round-shaped, above-ground swimming pools are the cheapest form of
temporary storage for carted water;
• consider bulk cartage of water by a contractor—it could be much cheaper in
the long run.
C Sell stock
This is a difficult decision but one worth planning well in advance, before stock
start suffering and the decision is taken out of your hands. If you are unsure where
to start, contact the nearest Agriculture Department for advice.
approximately. Below this ratio the costs should be worked out very carefully, as
the dam is only part of the outlay. Distributing the water can entail heavy
additional expense. Irrigation for drought insurance alone is unlikely to pay on
any ratio.
When underground water is available, the cost of building a dam can be
compared with the costs of sinking a bore. If there is good quality water
underground in reasonable quantity, it takes a very favourable irrigation dam to
outclass a bore. It is the high evaporation loss that makes dam water expensive.
The unreliability of run-off to fill a dam may also favour a bore. In the case of
dams filled by pumping, filling the dam adds further to the cost of stored water.
It is difficult for the average landowner to predict whether or not a water
conservation and irrigation project will pay. This is because some landowners lack
detailed facts and figures on the likely increase in production to be expected from
a change in irrigation method (DoA SA, 1970).
However, a good method for comparing irrigation with other investments is as
follows:
i calculate the capital value and net returns of the property in its present state.
ii work out the net returns as a percentage return on capital.
iii determine the extra capital involved in setting up the irrigation project, and
add this to the present capital.
iv estimate the increased returns due to irrigation, not forgetting to deduct
pumping costs, depreciation, extra labour, fertiliser costs and loss of
production from land flooded by the dam. Add this figure to the present
returns from the property.
v calculate a new percentage return, using the new capital and return figures.
Steps iii, iv, and v are then repeated for the other proposed investment or
improvement, and this new percentage return on capital is worked out. Whichever
project gives the higher percentage return is the better one from an economic point
of view.
of the foundation survey will depend upon the site conditions and on the height
of the dam wall. Test holes should be taken at intervals along the centre-line of the
dam (Figures 2.1 and 2.2), using either a hand auger or backhoe to cut a trench
to determine the nature of the soil profile. The depth and spacing of the holes
should be sufficient to determine the suitability of the foundation. The location of
these holes will depend on the occurrence of significant changes in the soil profile.
The holes should be deep enough to identify the underlying materials that may
affect the design or safety of the structure. A record, or log, of each hole or test
pit should be made. This should show the location, depth and classes of materials
encountered. Each test hole location should be marked on the ground for future
reference, in case more detailed surveys are required.
Top of bank
Spillway Embankment
1m e
a
1m 2
_ e
3
b c d
TH1 2
_a TH6
3
TH2
2
_ 2
_
3 b 3 d
2
_
TH3 3 c TH5
TH4
If seepage loss rates greater than 3 L/hr (50 ml/min) are confirmed, then other
factors must be considered before proceeding with the project. These would
include the purpose of the water supply scheme, the availability of water for the
dam and the likely cost of treating the seepage area.
A comparative evaluation of falling water levels over an area can then provide
an indication of permeability and may indicate relative clay contents. Infiltration
rings are a more sophisticated way of assessing infiltration capacity for irrigation
design purposes.
Like sands and gravels, some jointed formations of rock are permeable and
encourage seepage. Dams have failed due to sinkholes developing in the floor of
the storage. This usually occurs when limestone underlies the soil. Water from the
storage dissolves the rock to form vertical holes, which in turn lead to
underground cavities and springs.
2.2.2 Stability of dam sides
As the level of stored water rises, so does the water table in the sides of the dam.
Soils and rocks, which are quite stable when dry, may become weak when
saturated. This could cause a landslip, which in turn will reduce the capacity of
the storage. Frequently this problem is aggravated by cutting the borrow pits too
close to the reservoir sides.
2.2.3 Sedimentation in dams
Sedimentation is a problem that occurs in catchments with active soil erosion. In
these cases, advice should be sought from a soil scientist. Sometimes it is possible
to remedy the problem at its source; if not, it may be necessary to resort to filter
strips and silt traps. Filter strips are dense stands of stiff, long-stemmed plants
intermingled with grass. These strips reduce the velocity of the water and so cause
silt to be deposited.
In the case of choosing a gully site where sedimentation may be a problem, the
following topographical features should also be borne in mind.
• The storage should be located in a wide valley just upstream of a narrow gorge.
This will initially provide maximum storage for minimum earthworks. Over
time, silting will reduce the storage capacity of the dam and it will require
maintenance (see Section 6.3.8).
• It should be located on the flat slope of a stream rather than on the steep slope.
This provides a larger capacity of stored water for any given wall height of a
dam.
surface, no special measures are required. It is sufficient to remove the topsoil, and
scarify or disc plough the area to provide a bond with the material in the dam wall.
A compacted clay cut-off trench can be constructed to extend from the surface of
the ground into the impervious layer. This prevents possible failure by tunnelling
and excessive seepage.
A detailed investigation should be made where the foundation consists of either
pervious sand or a sand–gravel mixture, and the impervious clay layer is beyond
the reach of equipment. While such a foundation might be satisfactory in terms of
stability, corrective measures will be required to prevent excessive seepage and
possible failure.
In the case of a foundation consisting of, or underlain by, a highly plastic clay
or unconsolidated material, very careful investigation and design is required in
order to obtain stability.
Water stored on bedrock foundations rarely gives cause for concern unless the
rock contains seams, fissures or crevices through which water may escape at an
excessive rate. Where rock is encountered in the foundation, careful investigation
of the type and physical properties of the rock is required.
Foundations must be capable of supporting the weight of the dam and must be
sufficiently watertight to prevent seepage under the dam. Springs, soaks or
landslips indicate unstable soil conditions and should be avoided.
Therefore, the three main kinds of foundation material are:
Clay Clay foundations are usually satisfactory, provided they are of the
same material as that placed in the earth bank. However, if they are
soft and saturated it may become necessary to remove them or place
additional stabilising fills. Highly expansive clays, which shrink and
swell during cycles of wetting and drying, may be unsuitable because
of risks associated with tunnelling and high seepage rates.
Rock Most rock can support the weight of the dam. Care must be taken to
ensure that seepage does not occur between the rock foundation and
the earth-fill dam so that weathering of the rock does not lead to
weakening of the foundation, or that permeable zones are not
created by joints and faults. Care should also be taken where
expansive rock is being excavated, since elastic recovery (or
expansion) of rock material occurs in response to reduced pressures,
as the overburden is removed.
Sands and The problem with this type of foundation is high seepage losses.
gravels While it is possible to build dams with these materials, the cost is
frequently prohibitive. Such sites are best avoided and an alternative
location found.
is built when there is only a limited amount of clay available at the site. The bulk
of the bank is constructed from relatively pervious material with a thin layer (that
is, a diaphragm) of clay on the upstream slope. This layer varies from 0.6 to 1.0
m thick, depending on the height of the dam.
Good, impervious material contains about 25 per cent clay with the balance
made up of silt, sand and some gravel. Too much clay results in the embankment
being weak and prone to expansion and contraction with changes of moisture
content. Insufficient clay can cause excessive seepage through the bank.
The usual method for exploring the material at a potential dam site is hand
auger boring. This is the cheapest method, although it is very hard work for the
operator and provides a disturbed sample. It is therefore advisable to sink a test
pit or trench so that the soil can be examined in its natural state.
Dam sites are tested on a fixed pattern. Small dams (up to 3 m high) have a
minimum of six test holes, four in the centre-line (including one on the spillway)
and at least two in the borrow pit area (Figure 2.2). For larger farm dams the
number of test holes is increased, with holes at 20 m intervals in borrow pits
TH9
30 m
TH8
TH7
Direction of flow
Embankment
Centre-line
Spillway
where sites are steep or complicated. This spacing can be increased to a 70 × 100 m
grid when the site is flat or uncomplicated. The test holes on the centre-line of
larger dams are spaced at about 30 m intervals. The test holes in the borrow pits
are sunk to about 3 m or to rock, while those in the dam centre-line are put down
to at least two-thirds of the dam height or to rock.
When the exploration has been completed, all test holes and pits should be
carefully filled to prevent human and stock injury and compacted to prevent
seepage/leaks.
Sand >85% –
Loamy Sand 70–85% –
Sandy Loam 50–70% <20%
Sandy Clay Loam 45–80% 20–35%
Clay Loam <45% 40%
Sandy Clay 45–65% >35%
Clay <45% >40%
Source: Fietz, 1969; Stephens, 1991.
100 0
80 20
Sil
t, i
np
60 Clay
40
erc
nt
en
rce
t
Silty
pe
Sandy clay
, in
40 clay
ay
60
Cl
dam which are unlikely to dry out, such as in the core trench or covered by topsoil
with grass.
2.6.2 Embankment soil
Semi-pervious materials, such as sandy clays and clay loams which contain a
proportion of fines as clay, are suitable for inclusion in the upstream batter. These
will allow limited passage of water and will resist slumping when wet in a properly
constructed embankment. Where poorer soils are used, special attention to
compaction techniques will have to be given to minimise the number of air voids
in the soil and to maximise its stability when wet.
Pervious materials such as coarser grained sand and gravels can be used in the
downstream batter slope and sections of the embankment which require a large
mass of material and good drainage. A dry downstream face will prevent slippage
and reduce the risk of failure.
Silts These soils should be avoided in any section of the embankment. The
lack of cohesion, poor structure, fine material and difficulty in
compaction are their main drawbacks. A small proportion of silt is
permissible in a silty-clay, but care must be taken in its use and
application.
Sands A soil with a high proportion of sand should not be used in dam
construction. A sandy soil can be used in the downstream batter but
should not be used elsewhere unless there is no alternative. If a sandy
soil is used in other parts of the dam, attention must be paid to
compaction. Furthermore, the best soil should be kept for the core and
consideration given to ensuring embankment watertightness.
Crest
Freeboard
Full supply level
1 Desirable to spread
1 2 top soil over bank
Compensation pipe 3 Batter slope
Strainer
Compacted earthfill Gate valve
Creek bed
Strip topsoil from entire foundation area Core trench constructed under
Cut-off collars entire bank length into solid foundation
oil
than 1:2 if determined by design tr e
in sound rock r e
Co
EMBANKMENT ELEVATION
(Cross-section of creek)
Figure 3.2 Zoned dams with treatment of seepage flow lines for internal drainage
Drainage material
with drain pipe
Drainage material
Drainage material
Chimney drain
"H" less than 15 m
3:1 2:1
A or B A A or B
Drainage material
LEGEND
A -– impervious
B – semi-impervious to pervious
Drainage material – rock or gravel
height of approximately one-third the depth of the high water level. Such
saturation reduces the stability of the dam and creates maintenance problems.
This pressure line is also shown in Figure 3.2 and is called the ‘phreatic’ water
surface line. Major maintenance problems can occur if this is not taken into
account. These problems include undesirable growth of vegetation on the batter
and minor slippage from trafficking by animals and vehicles.
ii Zoned
At those sites where there are varying soil materials with widely differing
construction properties, and where high dams are being considered, a zoned
embankment should be considered. Zoned embankments consist of an impervious
core/blanket held in place and protected by a more pervious ‘shell’. The core may
be centrally placed, sloping or placed on the upstream slope in the form of a
blanket (Figure 3.2).
A zoned embankment is a better alternative for larger dams; this allows for the
use of construction machinery. Compared with homogenous sections, costs are
likely to be higher, mainly because the earthworks materials are divided into three
categories, that is
• pervious for the downstream section;
• impervious for the inner core section; and
• semi-impervious for the upstream section.
All of these materials need to be excavated from different borrow pits (preferably
from within the storage), thus increasing excavation and movement costs.
The use of pervious (sandy) soil materials in the shell can greatly reduce the
volume of the embankment as steeper batters can be used. Upstream blankets are
commonly used in conjunction with lining of the storage area of the dam.
For high embankments (greater than 10 m) the use of toe drains and blanket
drains allows the downstream slope to be maintained at a reasonable slope of
approximately 3:1 (horizontal : vertical). Without these provisions, much flatter
slopes would be required to maintain slope stability, particularly for clayey soils.
length should be completed at the one time. If this is not possible, then each
section must be well keyed and bonded to the next. To avoid seepage and
structural problems, the core trench and embankment shell should be designed as
one homogenous unit. Any water collected in the core trench should be removed
before backfill operations are started.
The value of installing the core correctly cannot be over-emphasised. Failure to
properly carry out these comparatively inexpensive techniques could lead to
inherent problems that remedial works will rarely solve. If the core and cut-off
trenches have not been placed on good foundation material, or layered correctly
with enough moisture to allow compaction, the structural integrity will be
compromised. In severe cases the dam will probably fail.
Where the foundation consists of pervious materials at or near the surface, with
rock or impervious materials at a greater depth, seepage through the pervious layer
should be reduced to prevent piping and excessive losses. Usually a cut-off joining
the impervious stratum in the foundation with the base of the dam is needed.
The trench should be filled with successive, thin layers of relatively impervious
material, with each layer being thoroughly compacted at near optimum moisture
conditions, before the next layer is placed.
3.1.3 Embankment batter slope
For homogenous dams, the following batter slopes are recommended for
embankments built of soils classified according to the Unified Soil Classification
system (see Section 2.5.2).
Case type A B
Homogenous or modified Modified homogenous
The batter slopes for most embankments on strong foundations can be 3:1
(horizontal to vertical) upstream and 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) downstream.
However, flatter batter slopes should be considered for dams structured on inorganic
clay or highly plastic and very fine inorganic silt. Organic soils are not useable as an
embankment material. They tend to be placed on the outside batters to establish
grassy vegetation. They act as a blanket by reducing internal dam moisture losses.
The batter slopes of a dam depend primarily on the stability of the material in
the embankment. The greater the stability of the fill material, the steeper the slopes
may be. The more unstable materials require flatter slopes. Table 3.1 contains
recommended maximum slopes for the upstream and downstream faces of dams
constructed of various materials.
3 2.75
4 3.00
5 3.25
6 3.50
7 3.65
8 3.85
9 4.00
Source: SCA, 1983.
Where the top of the embankment is to be used as a road access track then the
top width should provide for a shoulder on each side of the roadway. The crest
width in such cases should not be less than 4 m. An exception to this is a turkey’s
nest dam where usually the embankment is not high, and filling of the storage (by
pumping) is under control. Since there are no hazards, the crest width may be
reduced to as little as 1.5 m, if necessary (and if plant is available to work or trim
such a narrow crest).
3.1.5 Freeboard
Care must be taken to allow for wave action, especially on dams that have 0.7 km
or more of exposed water surface. For less than 0.7 km see Figure 3.4. Erosion by
wave action has certainly occurred on some of the large ‘shallow storages’ and on
large ring tanks. It is accentuated on very friable soils and/or fast slaking clays. It
is important to establish good grass protection on the upstream batter (as difficult
as this might be with changing water levels) to minimise wave erosion. Rock-
beaching would be the conventional engineering solution to wave erosion. However,
this is too expensive for most farm dams. A cheaper and more risky alternative—
trusting the landowner to do everything possible to establish the necessary grass
cover, and to replace eroded material when necessary—is recommended.
Freeboard is the added height of the dam provided, as a safety factor, to
prevent waves or run-off from storms greater than the design allows from
overtopping the embankment. It comprises the vertical distance between the
elevation of the water surface in the dam, when it is full, and the elevation of the
top of the dam after all settlement has taken place. A large number of dams have
failed due to overtopping and consequently greater attention must be paid to this
feature. Freeboard should not be less than 1.0 m and should include provision for:
a depth of flood surcharge to pass water through the spillway;
b wave action, which can be calculated from Hawksley’s formula:
H = 0.0138√F
where H = wave height in metres,
F = fetch distance (the longest exposed water surface in metres).
See Figures 3.3 and 3.4;
c an additional allowance of 0.3 m for unevenness in the crest level.
Using these provisions:
Freeboard (m) = depth of flood surcharge + wave action + 0.3.
0.40
0.35
Height of wave (metres)
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Length of fetch (metres)
Figure 3.4 Wave action based on fetch distance across the storage
Fetch distance
Full supply level
Embankment Spillway
Freeboard
Full supply level
Rock-beaching layer
(large rocks keyed in place)
Depth of storage
fluctuation Embankment
dam, down the upstream face to a level at least 1 metre below the lowest expected
level of the water in the dam. Rock-beaching may be placed by machine or by
hand. Machine placing requires more stone but less labour. The layer of stone
should be durable and large enough not to be displaced by waves. Where rock-
beaching is not continuous with the upstream toe, a berm should be provided on
the upstream face to support the layer of rock-beaching. In some circumstances
graded gravel filters may be required under the rock-beaching layer.
iv Other methods
Other methods include increasing the crest width of the dam, flattening the
upstream slope of the embankment, and applying a layer of coarse sand and gravel
on a 10:1 (horizontal : vertical) slope. These methods are applicable to arid areas
where vegetation is not reliable and rock and timber is not readily available.
Old tyres tied together and secured to the dam face have also been used to
maintain vegetation cover (Figure 3.6; see also Section 3.1.8 on fencing).
3.1.7 Topsoil cover
Prior to the placement of topsoil onto the compacted embankment, the surface
should be roughened to assist in combining the different soil types. Topsoil must
be placed over the entire embankment to a depth of at least 100 to 150 mm and
grassed with a good holding grass. The purpose of the topsoil cover is to:
• reduce surface erosion on either side of the batter slope;
• minimise surface cracking in the embankment;
• lessen the tendency of the surface material in contact with storage water being
dispersed; and
• lessen wide fluctuations in embankment moisture content.
3.1.8 Fencing
The complete fencing of embankment type dams is recommended where livestock
are grazed or fed in adjacent areas. Fencing provides the protection needed to
develop and maintain vegetation cover. When combined with a water facility
Bank crest
Separation depends on
water level fluctuations
Floating tyres
with tubes
fixed to anchor
on batter slope
Wind direction
below the dam, fencing allows good quality drinking water and eliminates the
danger of pollution by livestock. Fencing also improves wildlife habitat.
information is already available, the engineer can rarely justify the cost of such an
exercise and must resort to other means to estimate the maximum possible flood.
Where no other data is available, a very approximate peak flood estimate can
be made by taking the highest daily rainfall figure for the catchment and making
the assumptions that all dams in the same catchment are 100 per cent full, the
ground is saturated, and 100 per cent run-off will occur.
An important element in designing spillways of a dam is to establish run-off
within a specified return period (recurrence interval). Selection of a return period
depends on the economic balance between cost of periodic repair or replacement
and the cost of providing additional capacity to reduce the cost of repair or
replacement. In some instances, the possibility of causing damage to other works
by a failure may dictate the choice of the return period.
To protect a dam, flood flows entering the storage must be able to pass around
the embankment by a spillway or, as it is sometimes called, a by-wash. Most
spillways on farm dams are cut into the earth because concrete is too expensive.
They are generally designed to pass a 2 per cent probable flood. This refers to a
flood so large that there is only a 2 in 100 chance of it occurring in any year.
The generally accepted flood frequency return periods used are:
Minor dams (depending on consequences of overtopping) 10–50 years
Detention dams 50–100 years
Large dams >100 years
3.2.1 Peak flow estimation
The wide range of variation of Australian climatic conditions makes it difficult to
provide a simple method for estimating flood flows that can be applied generally for
small to medium-sized rural catchments. The methods more often used are based on
Australian Rainfall and Run-off, A Guide to Flood Estimation (IEA, 1987). For an
understanding of the methods discussed and selection of appropriate design values,
it is important that the probabilistic nature of the methods is recognised.
Engineers can, in most cases, calculate peak discharge for flood flow conditions
based on available observed flood flow data in the region of interest. For most of
Australia, sufficient data is available for the derivation of methods that reasonably
reflect reality. The methods in Australian Rainfall and Run-off (ARR) take into
consideration rainfall intensity, catchment characteristics and size, average slope
of the waterway and its length from source to the dam site. These same methods
of estimating peak discharge are used by local government and drainage and rural
water authorities for the design of most structures on waterways.
Estimation of required spillway size for farm dams is given in Section 3.3.3.
This is based on design discharge for small to medium rural catchments for an
Average Recurrence Interval (ARI) of 50 years, based on ARR (ibid.). This has
been calculated in Table 3.3 (Lewis, 2001a). The information in the tables should
only be used as a guide for assessment. An engineer experienced in hydrology and
farm dam design should be consulted before any works are commenced.
The formula as used in design of Table 3.3 is:
QY = 0.278 CY. It .A
c.Y
where QY = peak flow rate (m3/s) of average recurrence interval (ARI)
of Y years
CY = run-off coefficient (dimensionless) for ARI of Y years
It = average rainfall intensity (mm/h) for design duration of tc
c.Y
hours and ARI of Y years
A = area of catchment (km2). If area is in hectares instead of
km2, the conversion factor is 0.00278 (or 1/360).
Natural surface
Spillway
Outlet width
Inlet
am return
width of d
p
To
Embankment
passes through critical depth at the downstream edge of the level portion. The
flow is then discharged through the spill section.
The direction of slope of the spill section must be such that overflow will not
flow against any part of the embankment. Wing banks may be used to direct the
outflow to a safe point of release. The floor of the spillway should be excavated
into original earth for the full design width. Where this is not practical, the end of
the dam embankment and any earth fill constructed to confine the flow, should be
protected by vegetation or riprap. It is desirable that the entrance to the approach
channel be widened so it is at least 50 per cent greater than the designed bottom
width at the control section (Figure 3.7). The approach channel should be
reasonably short and should be planned with smooth, easy curves for alignment.
It should have a slope toward the dam of not less than 2 per cent except in rock,
to ensure drainage and low inlet losses.
The control section should be located near the intersection of the extended
centre-line of the dam with the centre-line of the spillway. A level section, at least
6 m in length, should be provided immediately upstream from the control section.
The exit spillway must have a slope that is adequate to discharge the peak flow
within the channel. A slope which is adequate for drainage is generally sufficient
(for example, 0.2 per cent). The exit spillway should be straight or gently curved
to spread the flow to a uniform depth over the lip of the spill section.
The spill section is the natural slope over which the peak flood-flow passes.
The width of the spill section is selected so that the permissible velocities for the
soil type, or the planned grass cover, are not exceeded.
3.3.3 Selecting spillway dimensions
With the required discharge capacity (Q) known (see Section 3.2) and the natural
slope of the spill section determined from plotting the spillway centre-line profile,
the bottom width of the control section, the width of the spill section and the
depth of the flow can be selected. Tables 3.4 and 3.5 give the appropriate control
section width for discharge capacity at various depths of flow. A spillway requires
a level section with a minimum length of 8 m and a cross-sectional area calculated
from the formula:
Q = 1.546 BH1.5
where Q = either a 1 in 50 or 1 in 100-year peak discharge (m3/s)
B = spillway width (m)
H = surcharge depth of flood discharge in spillway (m).
Spillway side slopes should be no steeper than 2:1 (Figure 3.7) unless the
spillway is excavated into rock, in which case the side slopes may be vertical.
Usually, the selected bottom width of the channel should not exceed 35 times the
design depth of flow. Where this ratio of bottom width to depth is exceeded, the
channel is likely to be damaged by meandering flow and accumulated debris.
Whenever the required bottom width of the spillway is excessive, consideration
should be given to the use of a spillway at each end of the dam. These two
spillways need not be of equal width so long as their total capacity meets
requirements. In cases where the required discharge capacity exceeds the ranges
shown (Tables 3.4 and 3.5) or topographic conditions will not permit the
construction of the exit channel bottom with a slope that falls within the required
ranges, the need for a piped or concrete lined spillway is indicated.
Wherever there is a good vegetative cover in the spillway area and the
topography (such as a natural saddle) is suitable, first consideration should be
given to the use of a natural spillway.
3.3.4 Chute spillways
Chute spillways on farm dams are not common because of their high cost, but
they may be used where grassed spillways are not possible. They are commonly
built of concrete, but may be of sheet steel, bituminous concrete, or other erosion
resistant material such as plastic sheeting. A natural rock surface, or a surface
allowed to erode down to hard rock may also be regarded as a chute spillway.
Inlet at
full supply Crest
level
Stilling blocks
before exit from
spillway chute
The materials used in chute spillways are harder, and more expensive than
earth. Therefore:
Strainer
Cut-off collar
Outlet pipe
1000 mm
Flow
500 mm
INLET DETAIL
3.0 m 1.0 m
Gate valve
Embankment
Cut-off collar
Outlet pipe
Stone beaching
Flow
Concrete apron
Concrete anchor block (500 mm square)
2.5 m
Cut-off wall
OUTLET DETAIL
spring flow, or flows that may continue for several days following a storm. This
type of spillway is designed to discharge such a small percentage of the peak flow
that it has no measurable effect on the emergency spillway design (see Section 6.3.6,
Figure 6.10).
The design capacity of a trickle pipe should be adequate to discharge long-
duration, continuous, or frequent flows without flow through the earth spillway.
3.4.2 Drop inlet structures
Generally a drop inlet structure consists of a vertical pipe (concrete or steel)
connected to a horizontal pipe (fitted with cut-off collars) which passes through
the bank and takes the flow away clear of the toe. These structures can be most
useful on a storage with a small catchment area where:
• all the flood flows might be flood-routed in surcharge and all the discharge can
go through a drop inlet;
• on a steep gully where a normal spillway is not practicable; or
• where the gully has an appreciable base flow.
Two precautions are taken to prevent unstable (full pipe) flow conditions from
occurring:
i There must be a significant gradient on the outlet pipe towards the
downstream end so that any flow entering the pipe through its inlet orifice can
flow away at less-than-full pipe flow. The entrance should be sharp, not
smoothly transitioned, to retain the orifice effect.
ii The top of the outlet pipe must be ventilated immediately downstream of the
drop pipe so that any air which is evacuated by mixing with the water in the
outlet pipe is immediately replaced at atmospheric pressure. This vent pipe has
to extend above maximum surcharge level of the storage.
It is also an advantage to have the drop pipe diameter about three or more
times the diameter of the outlet pipe, so that weir flow is likely to be the discharge
control under most surcharge conditions. This ventilated system will have less
capacity than one of the same size allowed to flow full, but is a much more
Crest
Trash rack
Downstream batter
Compacted embankment
Drop
inlet
Outlet pipe
Number of collars 3 4 5 6 8 12
Note: An absolute minimum of 3 cut-offs located upstream should be used. Cut-off collars may be constructed of concrete,
mild steel plate or PVC.
Foundation level
Inlet
Outlet valve A
Natural surface
6m
Compacted soil
= = =
around pipe or
Outlet rock-beaching Cut-off collars concrete encased
A1 Cut-off trench
150 mm 150 mm
Natural surface
200 mm
Compacted soil around pipe
or concrete encased Pipe size (mm)
150 mm
300 mm
Cut-off collar 1 m square
400 mm
300 mm 300 mm
P P P P P
H1 H2 H3 H4
A1 A2 A3 A4
T
L
b
a H
Hw
A1
Longitudinal view – embankment and storage
Cw
Hw H
Top of embankment
Spillway Full supply level
B
Example:
An estimate of the volume (m3) of material for an embankment in a gully is
required. The following information has been provided in Figure 3.13.
Cw = Embankment length = 25 m
T = Crest width = 3 m
H = Fill heights (m): H1 = 4.00, H2 = 4.5, H3 = 4.25 and H4 = 3.75
Batter slopes: a = 3: 1 (U/S), b = 2:1 (D/S)
As the 4 cross-sectional areas are evenly spaced P = 5 m; otherwise P the
perpendicular distance between end areas (Al , A2, A3 & A4) would need to be
calculated separately for each segment.
By using information provided, that is, crest width (T), fill height (H), batter
slope (‘a’ U/S & ‘b’ D/S), and Table 3.7—fill required for earth dams, the volume
(cubic metres per metre—m3/m) can be obtained between each cross-sectional area
for use in formula (2):
Areas at each section A1, A2, A3 and A4 from Table 3.7 are:
A1 = 52.0 (m3/m),
A2 = 64.1(m3/m),
A3 = 57.9 (m3/m),
A4= 46.4 (m3/m)
Substitute this data into formula (2) gives:
V = P × (0.5 A1 + A2 + A3 + 0.5A4)
= 5 × (0.5 × 52.0 + 64.1 + 57.9 + 0.5 × 46.4)
= 5 × 171.2
= 856 m3
3.5.2 Floor slope
All methods of calculating volumes assume a horizontal valley floor. This is
generally not the case. For floor slopes up to 5 per cent and banks of up to 6 m
high the difference in volume is not significant (less than 4 per cent).
3.5.3 Area beneath embankment
It is sometimes necessary to know the volume of stripping required from beneath
the embankment. This volume can be calculated by the use of the formula:
Volume = depth of stripping x area beneath banks
V = S × P CT + (a + b) ΣH
{P } (3)
(a) U/S 31 ⁄ 2:1 3:1 3:1 3:1 31 ⁄ 2:1 3:1 3:1 3:1 31 ⁄ 2:1 3:1 3:1 3:1
(b) D/S 3:1 3:1 21 ⁄ 2:1 2:1 3:1 3:1 21 ⁄ 2:1 2:1 3:1 3:1 21 ⁄ 2:1 2:1
Example:
Use the data from the example in Section 3.5.1 to find the volume (m3) of material
to be stripped.
S = 0.10 m
P=5m
C = 25 m
T=3m
ΣH = 4.00 + 4.50 + 4.25 + 3.75 = 16.5 m
3H :1V is 3, 2H :1V is 2, so a + b = 5
Substitute data into formula (3) gives:
V = S × P CT + (a + b) ΣH
{ P }
V = 0.1 × 5 (25 × 3) + 5 × 16.5
{5 }
3
= 48.7 m
3.5.4 Excavated tanks
Volumes of excavated tanks should be calculated by the prismoidal formula which
is:-
d (Al + 4Am + A2)
V= (4)
6
V = volume (m3)
d = depth between Al and A2 (m)
Al = top natural surface area (m2)
Am = mid area (m2)
A2 = bottom excavated area (m2)
Example:
Use the data from the example in Section 3.5.1 to find the volume (m3) of water
stored.
Hw = 3.5 m (includes 1.00 m freeboard)
L = 50 m
B = 15 m
Cw = 25 m
K × A × Hw
V= (6)
1000
interest in achieving a good result. However, these potential savings should not be
deducted from the cost estimate.
The estimate of costs should be based on rates which would reasonably be
expected to cover construction and materials. Should the client be able to obtain
a quotation at a cost lower than the design estimate, there is no reason why it
should not be accepted, provided the contractor has suitable equipment and agrees
to carry out the work in accordance with the plans and specifications.
For many purposes the future annual cost of a dam is important. This cost
determines whether the project is profitable (compared with the annual value of
increased production). It is also needed to combine with other annual costs to
determine the best project design. For example, a dam built at low capital cost,
but which had high annual cost for repairs and maintenance, might well cost more
than one built to a higher standard and initial cost with minimal maintenance cost.
The objective is an optimal combination of annual costs of capital and recurring
items. Comparison of all options should be considered before proceeding with a
choice of project.
Contractors generally work on an hourly rate of hire for each piece of
construction plant. The hire charge is negotiated between the landowner and
contractor before work commences.
Other forms of contract can be used:
• the plan will fit the site so that the structure will function properly; and
• all required dimensions, elevations and modifications are complete.
A common error in the preparation of the construction drawings is the
omission of required details, sections, and dimensions. All plans should be
carefully reviewed for completeness and accuracy.
4.4.1 Specifications
In addition to the detailed construction drawings, the construction plan often
requires written specifications to clarify how the work will be done, the quality of
workmanship, and methods of testing (see Appendix 2). Another important
component of the specifications is the required quality of the manufactured
materials that will be used in the work.
For small projects, the material and construction specifications may be
documented in the form of notes on the drawings. For larger projects, the
preparation of a separate specification document, or the use of Standards
Association of Australia (SAA) or ANCOLD or State guidelines are more
practical. In all cases, readability of drawings is vital to the success of the project.
4.4.2 Checklist
The amount of detail required in the construction plans will vary with the type
and size of the project. However, all projects regardless of size should be
adequately planned. The following list may be useful in checking the adequacy of
the drawings and specifications.
1 Can the farm be located from the plans?
2 Is the project site clearly shown?
3 Can the survey lines be relocated and the job pegged for construction as
designed?
4 Are all dimensions and construction details clearly shown?
5 Are material and construction specifications complete for all parts of the work?
6 Are material quantities shown?
7 Has the title block been completely filled, including the date and who designed,
drafted, amended and approved the work?
8 Has the cost estimate been prepared?
9 Have licence/permit documents been lodged with the responsible authorities?
in coloured pen on the office copy of the plans. These ‘as constructed’ plans are
often useful when making maintenance recommendations to the contractor. They
are also useful for structural design improvement and for the evaluation of
hydraulic performance. Moreover, complete ‘as constructed’ records may be
valuable in case of a legal dispute (see Section 10).
pegging the embankment, except that they are cut pegs rather than fill pegs. They
should be offset so they will remain in place for referral during construction.
Where suitable fill material must be obtained from a borrow pit, it is essential
that this area be clearly demarcated. Cut pegs should be set to control excavation
within the limits of suitable material and to drain the borrow pit.
A spillway or trickle pipe should be located by pegs offset from the centre-line
of the pipe and placed at intervals not exceeding 10 m. The spillway should be
located where it will rest on a firm foundation. Cuts from the tops of the stakes
to the grade elevation of the tube should be plainly marked on the pegs. The
locations of the low level pipe and gate valve, cut-off collars, outlet structure, and
other appurtenances should be identified by clearly marked, additional pegs.
Setting out of a dam site can vary from the pegging of the Full Supply Level
(storage area) at each end of the embankment to placing pegs all along the toes of
the embankment and spillway and the placing of offsets. For small dams offset
centre-line pegs (steel posts), full supply pegs (coloured) and one upstream toe peg
are normally sufficient.
Centre-line pegs should be placed well away from the construction area. Two
pegs placed 6 m apart at one end of the bank enable the centre-line to be easily
established during construction. Batter peg distances can then be calculated simply
from a longitudinal centre-line survey. It is important that all pegs and the bench
mark (see Section 4.2.2) are shown on the plan to minimise confusion.
The distance of toe pegs from the dam centre-line is calculated from a
longitudinal centre-line survey as follows:
Distance of toe peg = (Height at centre-line x batter slope) +
(half of the crest width).
3
= (6 × 3) +
2
= 19.5 m
This formula is only applicable to non-sloping sites. Adjustments must be made
to correct for the slope, when measuring a site for a high dam or where steep
slopes occur (for an example with 5 per cent slope [1:20, vertical : horizontal], see
Figure 5.1).
19.5
In this example the correction is distance = × 3 = 3 m (approx)
20
Crest width
Upstream batter slope
Downstream batter slope
3:1 (horizontal:vertical)
3:1 (horizontal:vertical)
Peg 6m
Peg
1
20
m = metres 3 x 6 + 1.5 = 19.5 m 3 x 6 + 1.5 = 19.5 m ~3 m
16.5 m 22.5 m
~3 m
19.5/20 x 3 (batter) = approx. 3 m
Source: SCA, 1983.
and crest of the embankment and all the cut surfaces of the spillway. It may be
necessary to cover the cut batters of the borrow pit if erosion is likely.
The thickness of topsoil necessary for erosion protection, insulation and
promotion of vegetation cover varies with slope, environment and soil type. A
common fault is an excessive thickness of topsoil on a steep batter that slides off
with the first heavy rainfall event. A thickness of 50 mm is generally sufficient to
establish a vegetative cover while a 200–300 mm thickness is required to provide
an effective insulation of the embankment against excessive moisture changes
(that is shrinkage and cracks).
The upstream batter is compacted more than the downstream batter to give
greater stability where the soil is wetter. Sandy clays are usually more stable under
moist conditions than soils with a higher clay content.
A ‘freeboard’ of about 1 m is required to protect the embankment from
overtopping. To minimise drying and cracking of the impervious embankment, it
is recommended that most of the freeboard zone is constructed from silty or sandy
topsoil. Increasing the minimum crest level required for freeboard by 5–10 per
cent allows for settlement of the embankment crest. If a wide crest is required for
vehicle access, make sure that wheel tracks do not form as water will pool in them
and increase the risk of erosion.
Topsoil stripped from the borrow area and embankment foundation should
only be used in the outer metres of the embankment, and never in lower regions.
The higher proportion of silt and organic material protects against rapid moisture
loss from the embankment, stopping it from cracking and providing an
environment for rapid growth of ground cover. Seeding the embankment surface
to protect against erosion is also recommended. All disturbed areas must be
protected against erosion by planting and maintaining a suitable holding grass for
the geographic area involved. The use of fertiliser and watering may be necessary
particularly during the establishment stages.
5.5 Compaction
Compaction is the most important factor in achieving a stable, durable and solid
earth embankment, which is resistant to the constant seepage of water through the
soil. Notably, many dams fail because of poor compaction.
Compaction occurs when pressures are applied to the soil so that the individual
soil grains are pushed together as air is expelled. Compaction in the field is
directed at reducing the percentage voids to less than 5 per cent. When soils are
saturated, the application of sustained pressure will also expel water from the pore
spaces separating the soil grains, resulting in a measurable reduction in soil
volume. This latter process is called consolidation.
When soil is disturbed, transported and used in construction without being
compacted by machinery, it is loose and friable with a high proportion of air
spaces between the soil grains. The soil mass will have high permeability and low
strength. Over time, this material will settle and become denser. However,
settlement will be uneven and deformation in a number of different directions may
occur. This will result in extensive cracking of the surface and eventual failure of
the structure. To protect against this, artificial compaction is used in the
construction of roads, earth dams and embankments (including levees and graded
banks) so that soil physical and engineering properties are modified. After
compaction, the soil mass should be characterised by high soil strength and low
permeability (the rate at which water will infiltrate and flow through the soil). In
addition, vulnerability to settlement in response to repeated loading should be
significantly reduced.
Compaction produces a uniform product and requires not only the appropriate
equipment and specifications, but also an understanding of the inherent properties
of the soil to be used. Therefore, before compaction is undertaken, the
permeability, shear strength and density of the undisturbed soil should be known.
In addition, because over-compaction can cause failure of the structure, soils need
to be tested to determine the maximum possible compaction.
5.5.1 Compaction when constructing a dam
Good compaction relies on a range of factors including soil characteristics, soil
moisture levels, the type of machinery, weather conditions and construction
methods. The soil to be compacted must be moist but not too wet, and must be
layered along the full length of the embankment at depths appropriate to the
equipment used. Farm machinery and hand methods are usually only sufficient to
compact layers less than 50–75 mm deep. Heavier equipment such as rollers can
work with layers up to 200 mm thick, and should be used where large quantities
and wide areas of soil are involved. In addition to compactive effort (roller
pressure and number of passes), the moisture content in the soil is vitally
important.
Each soil layer should be bonded to the previous layer by light scarifying along
the axis. Rolling should be continued until the roller feet do not completely
penetrate the soil. Large stones and lumps of partly decomposed rock, which
cannot be broken down by rolling, should not be incorporated.
This information has been written for those who are constructing their own
dam. However, it is recommended that expert advice is sought before taking any
action.
5.5.2 Recommendations for compaction
Compaction must form a part of the construction of all embankments.
• If a bulldozer is the only plant used for compaction, the correct moisture
content is critical. This is determined by a qualified engineer or geo-technical
expert.
• The moisture content for bulldozer compaction is higher than that required for
compaction by a roller.
• Standard Optimum Moisture Content (SOMC) is roughly equivalent to
moisture content at the plastic limit in clayey soils.
• When using a scraper, it is generally impossible to work with material that is
too wet. In these conditions, the equipment will bog when the moisture content
is greater than 4 per cent over optimum.
• Embankments of 3 m in height or exceeding 3m3 in volume should be rolled
with a ‘sheepsfoot’ or ‘pad’ roller.
• Flat-wheeled rollers are not recommended for the construction of small dams.
• If a dry crust forms during construction it must be broken up, watered and
mixed or removed from the embankment.
• If the soil is dispersive, soil moisture content during construction must be at
least OMC and a sheepsfoot roller should be used.
5.8 Equipment
The type of equipment you should use for building your dam will depend on:
• the size of the proposed dam;
• soil type;
• the amount of soil and distance it is to be moved; and
• operating conditions.
i Bulldozer
Topsoil should first be removed from the borrow pit and embankment areas and
stockpiled in the immediate area. Trees should not be included in the topsoil
stockpile area and room needs to be made for the bulldozer to push the topsoil
back over the embankment (that is, clear of any fences and trees). The topsoil
stockpile should be graded so that any rainwater will not form ponds and make it
too wet to push the soil material back onto the built wall.
Where there is a small amount of topsoil over uniform clay, it is better to
construct the dam as shown in Figure 5.5. This technique allows the material to
be pushed into place quickly because of the flatter grade. Suspect material should
be dug out so that there is a layer of good clay connected to a sound foundation.
Optimal compaction is achieved by running over each layer with a bulldozer.
Figure 5.4 The bulldozer—a track type of tractor
Figure 5.5 In-situ layers of different soil types used to form an embankment
Embankment
Topsoil Topsoil
Borrow pit
5m minimum
Core trench
separation
Steep gully edges, which would be under the wall, should be excavated to a 3:1
batter (horizontal:vertical). This will allow better compaction and prevent sheer
cracks forming if the wall material settles. A core trench the width of the tractor
blade is then dug down to clay, and the trench is ripped and refilled with good
clay.
Figure 5.5 is an example of how a bulldozer could be used to move individual
layers of different soil types to form an embankment.
ii Scraper
Heavy earthmoving machines such as elevating or push-loading scrapers are not
generally necessary for dam building unless you are in a hurry, short-haul
distances are involved, or you can obtain the machinery at economical rates. A
wheeled tractor or crawler-drawn dam scoop are sufficient for building some farm
dams. However, a vibrating roller is still considered the preferred machine.
5.8.1 Rollers
Rollers are designed for the purpose of soil compaction. They may have pronged feet
or smooth drums, they may be vibrating or static, and be self-propelled or towed by
a bulldozer. The type and size of the roller required depends on factors including soil
type, size of the project and required thickness of the soil layers. The maximum
recommended thickness of loose soil for compaction by a roller is 200 mm.
Figure 5.7 Self-propelled roller with blade to level off soil layers
To achieve adequate compaction, four to eight passes of the roller are required
over the same area. The cost of using a roller is usually less than 30 per cent of the
total dam construction cost. Sheepsfoot rollers can compact layers up to 200 mm
deep (before compaction) and satisfactory densities can be achieved with six to
twelve passes at a roller speed of 3 to 6 km per hour. It is important to keep the
rollers clean to avoid soil collecting between the feet.
Sheepsfoot rollers are more effective in compacting dry clay than other rollers
because the soil is blending and water is being distributed throughout the
constructed surface. Vibrating rollers are more suited to compacting soils with
lower cohesion characteristics and where very high soil densities are required.
Smooth wheeled rollers are more efficient at reducing air spaces, and continue
the compaction of lower layers of the embankment to a greater extent than
sheepsfoot rollers. Under conditions of comparable layer depths and speeds, a
smooth wheeled roller would probably require fewer passes than a sheepsfoot
roller to obtain similar soil densities. However, sheepsfoot rollers are often more
appropriate for dam construction as their lighter weight and versatility allow them
to be pulled by farm machinery over a range of surfaces (Stephens, 1991).
During construction (assuming the material is at optimum moisture content),
the compaction for banks up to 3 m may be done by bulldozer or dozer-scraper,
provided the layers do not exceed 100 mm. Where embankments are between 3
and 9 m, there should be at least four passes of a sheepsfoot roller over a 150 mm
layer. A guide to the minimum number of passes is provided in Table 5.1.
Notes: • USDA Soil Classification (see Section 2.5.2 and Figure 3.2);
• dispersible material should be compacted with two additional passes;
• homogenous banks of dispersible material, such as ML, MH, and CH should not be greater than 6 m in height.
exposed rock should be cleaned and any holes left by loose rock should be filled
with good quality CL material.
iv Inadequate compaction
This can result from using soils that are too wet or too dry during dam
construction, or using tracked plant rather than rollers. Even one layer of
inadequately compacted material in a bank can result in seepage and eventual dam
failure.
This is not a complete list, but serves as a guide. If a condition has changed
since the last inspection, records should be kept in the diary as follows:
• describe the change;
To cover extensive surfaces properly, several passes are required (Figure 6.2).
Adequate coverage can also be achieved using parallel or zigzag paths (Figure 6.3).
Figure 6.2 Successive passes
Sighting
A sighting technique, similar to that used when selecting straight pieces of timber,
can be used in identifying misalignment as well as high or low areas along a
surface. This technique is illustrated in Figure 6.4.
Figure 6.4 Sighting technique
Line viewing
The same method can be used to sight along the crest of a dam. Centre the eyes
along the line being viewed. Sighting along the line, move from side to side a little
to view the line from several angles (Figure 6.5). Looking through a pair of
binoculars will make any variations more obvious.
Figure 6.5 Sighting along crest
Crest of dam
Crest of dam
Crest of dam
Crest of dam
1 2 3 4
Straight Bowed
Probing
The blunt end of the probe (see Section 6.1.1) is pressed into the earth on the
batter slopes, crest or at places being inspected. Conditions below the surface,
such as depth and softness of a saturated area can then be noted. By observing the
moisture brought up on the probe’s surface and the resistance to penetration, it is
possible to decide whether an area is saturated or simply moist.
Pegging-stakes
The best way to find out if there is a leak is to check how fast water is
disappearing from a storage by marking the waterline with a peg at regular
intervals, for example weekly. If the storage is used for stock or irrigation, the
waterline should be pegged before and after use.
Measuring in this way is much better than simply guessing. A suspected leak,
when measured, may turn out to be only evaporation loss. Evaporation can easily
be 5 mm per day, and as much as 10 mm per day in dry and windy conditions.
• potential for damage resulting from failure of the dam (hazard category).
The larger a dam, the more frequently inspections are required. Notifiable
dams that have a significant hazard category, for example, need to be inspected
more frequently than once a year. Dams in this class are defined as being >5 m in
height with a 50 ML storage capacity, or 10 m in height with a 20 ML storage
capacity and their failure would result in significant economic damage or loss of
life (see Section 10.4.1).
The inspection frequency for a particular dam is the responsibility of the
owner, although large dams, or those suspected of being in a high risk or hazard
category, require professional advice. Detailed, comprehensive inspections can be
alternated with more frequent, rapid, visual inspections aimed at detecting
unusual changes that have occurred in the interim period.
Following a regular routine like this should enable the dam owner to become
aware of faults before partial or total failure occurs. Times when additional close
inspections are recommended are:
• before a predicted major rainstorm (check spillway and outlet pipe);
• during and after severe rainstorms (check spillway and outlet pipe);
• during and after a severe windstorm (check upstream batter slope for damage
from wave action); and
• after any earthquake or tremor, whether directly felt on the owner’s property
or reported by local news media.
Inspections should be made before and during construction, and also during
and immediately after the first filling of the storage.
Settlement
Seepage and leakage
Rilling
Blocked pipe
Stock traffic damage
Rabbit damage
Shrinkage cracks
Longitudinal cracks
Transverse crack
Pervious material
Clay
Dry material
Piping
Source: B. Lewis.
Longitudinal cracks are not usually dangerous but have proved troublesome
when combined with other weaknesses.
By contrast, transverse cracks need careful monitoring and can be particularly
serious because they tend to run straight through the dam. The main causes of this
type of cracking are:
• differential settlement due to steep and/or incompressible abutments;
• settlement of foundation; and
• saturated settlement of embankment.
Where saturated settlement of the embankment occurs, this will be due to
construction of the dam with material that is too dry. Consequently when the
storage fills, the dam material becomes saturated and then slumps. However, the
material above the seepage line remains dry and firm, resulting in an arched-type
failure.
6.3.4 Erosion
Erosion is also a problem with many causes and forms; the presence of dispersive
clays will usually increase its severity. The following are among the most common
forms of erosion associated with farm dams:
iv Sinkholes
Sinkholes are holes or depressions at the surface resulting from internal erosion
that has caused underground cavities into which the surface material eventually
subsides. Sinkholes are often a sign of severe and widespread hidden damage
caused by processes such as piping. It is necessary to determine the nature and
trace the extent of such damage, and to backfill all eroded areas with well
compacted (non-dispersive) clay before dealing with the visible surface holes or
depressions in a similar manner. Unless the defect is found to be superficial and
associated with surface run-off rather than leakage from the dam, professional
advice should be sought.
v Wind erosion
Erosion due to wind action can occur when the dam wall material has a high sand
or silt content, and vegetation cover is poor. It is often associated with the passage
of stock. Re-establishment of good grass cover is the best remedy.
A fence to exclude stock should be constructed around the perimeter of the
embankment, storage area, spillway and spillway downstream slope as soon as
possible after the dam is completed. Apart from damaging the grass cover and
creating ‘cattle pads’ which can lead to serious erosion, the water in the storage
can become turbid and polluted by continued stock access. The best alternative is
to provide stock water at a trough remote from the dam, or install a fenced
walkway to a restricted area of the dam.
viii Piping
When a failure is the result of an internal pipe or tunnel forming through an earth
dam, it is usually referred to by contractors as ‘piping’ and this may be a result of
a number of causes. The three most common causes are given below and are
illustrated in Figure 6.7.
1 Conventional piping
Water seeps through all earth dams, whether large or small. It is not the
occurrence of seepage that is problematic, but the rate of seepage. If the rate is
high, water will have the capacity to mobilise and transport soil particles. Viscous
drag forces within the dam will oppose this movement of water and so reduce the
eroding forces operating through the soil. If the drag forces exceed the eroding
force no piping will occur, but if they do not, then there is a serious likelihood that
piping failure will occur. Any line of weakness within the earth dam can accelerate
piping failure. This process may develop because no dam can be built of truly
homogenous (identical) material.
Conventional piping occurs in cohesionless soil (such as a silt). This form of
piping starts at the downstream side of the dam and then slowly proceeds to the
water face upstream. Collapse of the pipe also accelerates surface erosion.
2 Tunnelling
Tunnelling occurs in dispersive soils, which are soils that can be broken down or
separated into single grain components when placed in contact with water. The
process is initiated when water enters the dry soil through a crack, and then
disperses the soil exposed on the sides of the crack. The dispersed particles are
carried back, in suspension, to the dam storage. This process continues as more
water comes into contact with fresh dry soil and it will gradually take the form of
a tunnel (or pipe) which will eventually develop through the dam.
Since tunnelling starts at the water side of the dam it is more difficult to detect
than conventional piping, which starts on the downstream face. This makes
tunnelling far more insidious and dangerous than conventional piping.
3 Leaking pipe
Another form of piping results from poor laying techniques used on outlet pipes
as described in Section 5.9. This includes poor compaction around, and
particularly beneath the pipe, which is a difficult zone to reach and is frequently
neglected. The disturbance of a laid pipe by the movement of earthmoving plant
over it can also initiate problems. For example, a dozer may hit a cut-off collar
(see Section 3.4.3) and this in turn may create a ‘roofing’ condition (Figure 6.8).
Figure 6.8 Pipe bedding problems
Poorly compacted
A frequent cause of outlet pipe failure is leakage in a poorly jointed pipe. This
is usually accelerated where a downstream valve has been included in the dam
design (Figure 6.9). The use of an upstream valve would at least decrease the
pressure on the joint and ensure that this reduced leakage flow would be confined
within the pipe.
Figure 6.9 Pipe failure above and below gate valve
Phreatic line
Full supply level Cavity formed due to seepage
Upstream gate valve leaking into crack in outlet pipe
Inlet
Outlet
ii Slides
Slides can be described as the downward movement of soil on the slopes of dams.
The slide usually has three distinct features. First, tension cracks develop on the
crest, then a substantial portion of the dam slips downwards, and finally a
pronounced heave occurs near the toe. Warnings of likely slides are first given by
these surface cracks on the crest or on the upper sections of the sloping sides (see
Figure 6.7).
Material that is likely to slide can occur on upstream and/or downstream
batter slope sides of an embankment. Slope failure and slides occur where dams
are built:
• on soft or clayey foundations with low strength;
• where batter slopes are too steep; or
• where the bank is insufficiently compacted.
This type of failure is most dangerous because it usually occurs when the dam
is full and therefore can cause a catastrophic flood wave downstream of the dam.
Additional problems can arise if a slide obstructs the outlet pipe, because it would
be impossible to release stored water. The danger, if detected early enough, can
sometimes be controlled by the reduction of water level in the storage, or by the
placement of stabilising rock-fill at the toe of the potential slide.
Slump extends to the centre-line of the embankment
Slides are major structural defects, normally requiring major remedial works
such as flattening of batter slopes, improved drainage or the addition of rock-fill
as a stabilising weight at the toe of a slope. Selection of an economical and
effective remedy normally requires expert professional advice. In the short term, it
may be necessary to drain or pump out the stored water.
Slides can be divided broadly into three categories.
1 Construction slides which develop during the construction phase and may
occur on either the upstream or the downstream slopes. Almost without
exception, construction slides occur where dams are being built on soft or
brittle clayey foundations. This type of slide failure is seldom responsible for
serious damage because it takes place before the storage is filled, but it can be
embarrassing to both the designer and contractor. Two forms of construction
failure can occur. In the first case there is a rapid downward movement of soil
over a very short period (from 5 to 15 minutes). The vertical drop of the slide
could easily be as much as 3 m on a 6 m dam. In the second case, there is a
slower, uniform movement spread over a much longer period, usually up to
about two weeks, followed by a very slow creep. These two kinds of
construction slides are due to differences in the soil structure of the foundation.
2 Downstream slides which may develop after construction. The two kinds of
downstream slides are the deep slide and the shallow surface slide.
• Seepage through or under the dam creates internal pore water pressure
causing a slide which moves deep into the clay foundation and often
develops into the upstream slope of the dam. A frequent complication arises
when it completely obstructs the outlet pipe making it impossible to release
water as an immediate response.
• The shallow surface slide is often more due to saturation of the downstream
slope after heavy rains. It may vary in thickness from 50 mm to 1.2 m and
is most frequently found in poorly compacted farm dams. It is not generally
dangerous but can be expensive to repair.
3 Upstream slides which usually occur after a rapid draw-down of water in the
storage. Like the deep downstream slide, it has a slide surface that cuts well
into the foundation. Rapid draw-down refers to any water level drop in excess
of 1000 mm per day (Table 3.1). Dam engineers make special allowances in
their design for storages where rapid draw-down is anticipated.
Also hillside dams can be impacted upon by uphill slides, even though they are
not located on the structure itself. In these cases, the balance between equilibrium
and landslide conditions may be particularly sensitive on the slope, causing the
least disturbance to mobilise vast volumes of soil downhill. The excavation for a
hillside storage, together with the presence of groundwater, sometimes creates
conditions resulting in an uphill slide into the storage.
6.3.6 Defects in associated structures
i Spillway blockage
The construction of an earth dam is not just a matter of pushing up a wall across
a gully. Many dams built this way fail because they do not have an adequate
spillway capacity to prevent floodwater overtopping the dam, or erosion on the
spillway return cuts back into the downstream sloping batter. As with most
problems, prevention is a cheaper and simpler strategy, so the following points are
recommended when designing your dam.
• All too frequently the importance of an adequate spillway is not fully
appreciated. When considering the size of a spillway, many people try to relate
it to the normal everyday winter flows that occur in the creek or stream. What
they do not realise is that these flows can be exceeded many times over and that
the safety of the embankment, on which they spend so much money, depends
entirely on the ability of the spillway to operate under high storm flow
conditions.
• The costs of repairing a failed storage and paying compensation for
downstream damages will be far greater than the cost and effort involved in
providing a few extra metres of spillway width.
• If spillways are blocked in order to increase the storage capacity, the bank may
overtop. This is a situation fraught with danger and must be rectified. Debris,
bushes, trees, shrubs, fences and tall grass should be regularly cleaned from all
parts of the spillway, including the approach area.
Trash rack
300 mm min. clearance from
embankment to top of pit
Embankment crest
The trickle pipe is laid under the dam crest and run down the downstream
slope of the dam in a trench. Cut-off collars are used to prevent water flowing
along the trench outside the pipe.
The larger the trickle pipe, the larger the flow that can be passed and the greater
the cost of installation. For pipes up to 225 mm in diameter, PVC sewerage piping
is generally used because it is cheaper than steel, although concrete pipes are used
in some cases. The cover over the pipes should be not less than 350 mm deep. In
selecting a pipe class, it is advisable to contact the manufacturer to determine the
most suitable pipe and depth of cover to support anticipated vehicle traffic loads.
The outlet pipe on the downstream side of the storage should direct water onto
a rock mattress which is composed of graded layers of crushed rock to dissipate
energy and prevent scouring in the creek.
6.3.7 Vegetation
Trees
Planting trees and shrubs can provide windbreaks that prevent wave action and
associated soil erosion, and provide shelter for wildlife. Self-sown plants, trees or
other deep-rooted plants should not be permitted on the embankment and
spillway. The roots of these types of vegetation can provide a path for leakage
through the dam, and ultimately result in its failure. Trees that are alive and
apparently vigorous, such as poplars, can have dying roots with similar
consequences. Vegetation larger than small shrubs should not normally be allowed
to grow. Once established, a decision on whether trees should be removed, left
undisturbed or severely pruned has to be made on the basis of the particular
circumstances of the site. Rotting tree roots can also form tunnels that allow water
to leak and seep through the dam bank. These tunnels can lead to failure through
piping erosion. Seepage flow through the embankment or abutments can lead to
the development of high water pressures near the downstream face, causing failure
through sliding or erosion. Adequate compaction and the use of appropriate
materials in the design and construction phases may prevent these conditions from
occurring. If trees are required at a dam site, they should be planted at the
upstream section of the water storage, well away from the dam and spillway, in
line with the dam and at right angles to the dominant wind direction.
Desilting
While water levels are low in a dam, farmers have an excellent opportunity to
remove excess silt and mud from storages. One simple method of desilting is to
use a mud scoop of 1–2 m3 capacity and two tractors. The mud scoop is pulled
through the dam by the cable of a heavy crawler tractor and the mud is deposited
on the downhill side. The empty scoop is returned to the other side by a lighter
tractor and then pulled through as before (Nelson, 1968).
Care should be taken to ensure that the equipment does not expose sandy
seams on the sides or bottom of the dam as these would cause excessive seepage.
If sandy seams are discovered, leave 150 mm of silt to form a water-tight layer.
High levels of silt in a dam indicate soil erosion problems within the catchment.
6.3.9 Weed control
Aquatic weeds in farm dams can block pump and pipe inlets, deter stock from
drinking, and in some cases, taint the water (see Section 8.2). If weeds are treated
when they first appear, dams can be kept relatively free of some of the more
troublesome species. All plants can become a problem and each type may require
a different control method. However, in all situations the same factors should be
considered in deciding what control methods, if any, should be used. In each case:
• determine whether there is a problem, and if so, what it is;
• identify the plant causing the problem;
• find out what control methods are available and which of them could be used
safely;
• investigate whether these control measures could cause any other problems (for
example, toxicity to fish and livestock) and if so, whether they can be avoided;
and
• decide whether control is practical, desirable and worthwhile.
help in the short term in some instances but usually these dams eventually need
rebuilding.
Since compaction is one of the most important factors in dam construction, it
should be remembered that wheeled tractors or sheepsfoot rollers are superior to
bulldozers. This is largely because bulldozers are designed to spread their weight
over the tracks with a large surface area and therefore exert low pressure. With
the cost of bulldozing being quite considerable these days, it is important to get
any reconstruction job done by an operator with a good reputation for building
dams (see Section 5.8). The best approach is to ask neighbours with good dams
‘Who built your dam?’ The local water distribution officer is also a good source
of information. Two or three quotes should be obtained for the project, including
details on when construction can be done. Remember contractors, like farmers,
are often at the mercy of the weather and usually cannot guarantee to be at your
property on a particular day.
6.4.2 Use of soil additives
Soil additives are used to stabilise some dispersible clay soils and to clog up other
soils that are highly stable but leak (SRW, 1995).
i Gypsum
Because of its calcium content, gypsum has been recommended to stabilise
dispersible clay and hence reduce the incidence of tunnelling and slumping.
Gypsum should be added to the soil when building new dams and after repairing
failed dams in dispersible clay soil areas.
ii Bentonite or Volclay
Bentonite or Volclay are trade names for a naturally occurring clay that swells up
as a gel, when wet, to about ten times its original size (CETC, 1995). It is this
property that makes it useful for sealing dams. These expanding clays are best
suited to reducing seepage in dams made from sandy or gravelly soils. Where it is
impractical to drain the dam the clay can be sprinkled onto the water surface of
the storage. Although it has a role in emergency repairs, it is only of limited use.
If the leak is too rapid, or the clay is too thinly distributed in the water, the effect
will be minimal.
Freeboard height
Topsoil 50 mm Full supply level
Crest width
to 150 mm deep
10 or more
1
2 1–2 to 3 1m
1
Bank height 3 to 4 3 to 4
1 1
Topsoil
Liners
Notes:
1 Total costs of polyethylene and vinyl liners include a secondary cover of heavy duty sheeting around the top half of the
dam, to protect the liner from sunlight and other causes of damage. Protective covers of soil may be applicable where
gradients are no steeper than 3.5:1 (horizontal:vertical).
2 The range in total costs for bentonite, sodium tripolyphosphate, sodium carbonate and gypsum-stabilised soil includes
allowance for a protective cover of untreated soil 100 mm to 1000 mm thick over the treated layers. Different thicknesses
are necessary in different situations to protect treated layers from varying degrees of erosion, drying and cracking.
3 Costs do not include the provision of a firm compact base onto which liners or other treatments are placed. Dam
construction costs are also additional and are valid at time of writing this book.
4 Not all types of liners or chemicals are listed in this table. Information about other treatments can be obtained from the
suppliers.
5 Material costs do not include allowances for transport or delivery.
Seepage which flows both directly into the storage area and as low flows in
gullies may have very high levels of salinity. This salinity is often associated with
a rising water table caused by clearing of trees, or by unusually wet periods, and
may well occur for the first time after a storage is built. If this saline water is
allowed to accumulate in a dam during dry weather, the overall quality of the
water may deteriorate so that the water is unsuitable for irrigation even after fresh
run-off has occurred.
It is therefore important to check the salinity of any low flows present at the
design stage. If any salinity is present, steps need to be taken to ensure that this
water by-passes the storage. If this is not practicable, the site should not be used
for storage.
Any source of farm water other than rainwater, which is intended for human
consumption should be tested to ensure that no pathogens or toxins are present.
Sheep
working 54 37 16.4
grazing 36 27 11.3
Pigs
laying 32L/100 – 12
pullets or broilers 18L/100 – 7
turkeys 54L/100 – 20
Source: Modified ANZECC, 1992 and Hislop, 1998.
Note: The above figures are only average consumption. Higher demands in hot, dry weather conditions and with dry or salty
feed.
in the trickle tubes, and bacteria or mud in water supplies can cause reduction in
milk quality. The treatment of muddy water is discussed in Section 7.3.
To minimise the risk of muddy water supplies, domestic household water for
drinking and cooking purposes should be supplied by rainwater collected from the
roofs of houses and sheds.
ii Precautions
Dams intended for household supplies or trickle irrigation should be fenced out
from stock. Ducks and geese should also be denied access. While this is primarily
a hygiene precaution, it also prevents the clay from being stirred up. It is advisable
to check carefully that muddy water is not caused by erosion in the dam
catchment. If this is the case, the erosion should be treated because correcting this
problem is less costly than continually treating the water.
7.2.2 Stock water
General farm use is taken to include spraying, dipping, washing in dairies and
milking sheds, and septic tank flushing. As a consequence of the wide variety of
uses, it is not feasible to lay down specific water quality criteria.
Some properties rely on dams for their stock and domestic water supplies.
They are filled from either local run-off or from water supply channels that flow
only once a year to enable the dams to be filled. The main problems with this
water include the high turbidity or clay colloid content and faecal pollution from
animals with access to the dam. To control this, a proportion of the water supplies
from the dam should be stored at regular intervals in a steel or concrete tank and
treated to flocculate the clay and eliminate bacterial contamination.
The major factor determining the suitability of water for stock use is its total
salinity. In general, stock can tolerate water having total soluble salts (TSS) levels
far in excess of those acceptable to humans. Table 7.3 shows the generally
accepted limits of TSS in water, which can be drunk by stock over long periods.
7.2.3 Irrigation water
Water can be obtained from natural run-off, diversion from streams and rivers or
the development of underground resources by bore or dragline hole, but it must
be of acceptable quality. In general, the quality of water for irrigation can be
assessed in terms of six criteria, which together indicate the potential harm to
crop, soil or equipment. These criteria are: pH, total salinity, sodium adsorption
ratio, residual alkalis, specific ions, and iron (where micro-irrigation is involved).
In addition, type of plant, nature of soil, extent of drainage and climatic
conditions may determine the feasibility of an irrigation proposal.
the bottom. However, water in the dam will only stay clear until the next run-off
event, when sediments either flow into the dam or are stirred up from the dam
floor. When this occurs, the water has to be treated once more. Therefore, instead
of attempting to treat water in the dam, it is more effective and economical to
pump a required quantity of water into a holding tank. A fully-dissolved basic
solution of 1 kg each of alum and lime per 10 000 L is prepared and tested with
proportionate quantities of solution and water to determine whether the
concentration should be increased or reduced. If the quantities are satisfactory, the
solution is stirred thoroughly into the tank water. It will take from 24 to 48 hours
for the suspended clays to settle. The clean water can then be drawn off and the
tank cleaned in preparation for the next batch.
Biological
Arsenic 50
Barium 1 000
Cadmium 5
Cyanide 100
Nitrate-N 10 000
Nitrite-N 1 000
Selenium 10
Organic
Benzene 10
Carbon tetrachloride 3
1,1–Dichloroethene 0.3
1,2–Dichloroethane 10
Pesticides
Aluminium 200
Ammonia (as N) 10
Chloride 400 000
Copper 1 000
Hardness (as CaCO3) 500 000
Iron 300
Manganese 100
pH 6.5–8.5
Sodium 300 000
Total dissolved solids 1 000 000
7.4.1 Problems
The problems caused by algae may be physical or biological:
Physical
• clogging of filters, meters, valves and trickle irrigation lines;
• corrosion of metal tanks and other structures; and
• de-oxygenation of the water during decay of a heavy growth,
Biological
• tastes and odours, which may be particularly noticeable in water used for the
house and garden;
• stock poisoning;
• death of fish and animals; and
• unsightly slimes on channels, tanks and troughs, and scums on the surface of
dams.
Not enough is known yet about the mechanisms of algal poisoning, or for
instance, when a scum becomes dangerous to humans or animals, although in
some cases the toxin has been isolated. The toxicology of algae is very variable;
research into the underlying mechanisms is ongoing. Physical symptoms in
humans can vary from loss of appetite, skin sensitisation to convulsions, paralysis,
and death.
Wind movement can concentrate the algal scum into a corner of the dam. If
animals consume a large amount of this material, they may become very sick.
However, it has been observed that these algae do not always affect animals and
it is believed that only under certain conditions do the algae release a toxin
(poison) into the water. A symptom of algal poisoning in diary cattle is loss of
appetite and the consequent decline in the milk yield. An animal can die as rapidly
as fifteen minutes after drinking contaminated water.
Prevention or reduction of algal blooms requires minimising the requirements
of algal growth. Although covering the water surface to lower sunlight is only
practical for small dams, trees may be located to provide appropriate shade.
The bed of the dam should be cleared before it is filled to reduce the quantity
of organic matter. Nutrient-rich sediments in the beds of farm dams have been
treated only on an experimental basis. Reeds and rushes along the dam margins
will compete with algae for nutrients and will provide shelter for wildlife.
Maintenance will be required to control the reeds and rushes. Cutting and removal
of reeds and rushes also lowers nutrient levels (see Section 8.1.5).
Waterborne sources of nutrients include phosphorus and nitrogen in fertilisers
and organic residues from stockyards, feedlots and dairies. Drainage from these
areas should be diverted away from the waterway and utilised elsewhere.
If any form of algae is found in a water storage, you should still seek the advice
of a person experienced in the area of water science immediately, before
attempting to treat the problem.
7.4.2 Identification
The type of algae should be identified as an initial step to defining optimal
treatment strategy. Identification is important if stock deaths have occurred. A
sample of the algae plus water should be collected in a clean drink container of
one litre capacity. The container should be filled, with a small air gap and tightly
sealed. An explanatory note giving details of the dam and the problem should be
attached. Samples should be sent to an accredited water laboratory for
identification.
0–800 • Good drinking water for humans (provided there is no organic pollution and not too much
suspended clay material).
• Generally good for irrigation, although above 300 EC some care must be taken, particularly
with overhead sprinklers that may cause leaf scorch on some salt-sensitive plants.
• Suitable for all stock.
800–2 500 • Can be consumed by humans, although people prefer water in the lower half of this range,
if available.
• When used for irrigation, requires special management including suitable soils, good
drainage and consideration of soil tolerance of plants.
• Suitable for all livestock.
2 500–10 000 • Not recommended for human consumption, although water up to 3 000 EC could be drunk
if nothing else is available.
• Not normally suitable for irrigation, although water up to 6 000 EC can be used on very salt
tolerant crops with special management techniques. Over 6 000 EC, occasional emergency
irrigation may be possible with care or if sufficient low salinity water is available, this could
be mixed with the high salinity water to obtain an acceptable supply.
• When used for drinking water by poultry and pigs, the salinity should be limited to about
6 000 EC. Most other livestock can use water up to 10 000 EC.
Over 10 000 • Not suitable for human consumption or irrigation.
• Not suitable for poultry, pigs or any lactating animals, but beef cattle can use water to 17 000
EC and adult sheep on dry feed can tolerate 23 000 EC. However, it is possible that water
below these levels could contain unacceptable concentrations of particular ions. Detailed
chemical analysis should therefore be considered before using high salinity water for stock.
• Water up to 50 000 EC (the salinity of the sea) can be used to flush toilets provided
corrosion in the cistern can be controlled, and for making concrete provided the
reinforcement is well covered.
Source: Modified from SR&WSC, 1970.
cover. Food sources include unharvested grain and insects in irrigated pasture.
Furthermore, the waterways and drainage pondages are sites for breeding, feeding
and resting. Balanced against this is the drainage of natural swampland, and the
clearing and channelling of waterways, all of which decrease or fragment habitats
for wildlife. Any wildlife management program in irrigated regions must provide
adequate breeding facilities, which are associated with an ample food supply as
well as shelter. Government agencies are endeavouring to provide this on State-
owned land but the assistance of the general farming community is necessary if the
land is to support sufficient numbers of waterbirds.
If the present waterfowl populations are to be maintained, we must not only
develop existing wetlands, but create new areas of suitable habitat. The
characteristics of a farm dam, which are relevant to wildfowl conservation, are
discussed in Section 8.1.7. It should be noted that many of these characteristics
conflict with the requirements for fish production, and it is often difficult to
reconcile these in the management of any one dam. However, dams of both types
occur, and there is a sufficient number to allow management for both fish and
wildlife conservation.
8.1.1 Water regime
The amount of wildlife attracted to a farm dam is determined by the area of the
water surface. A surface area between 0.2–1.0 ha has been found to be the most
practical. The feeding depth for most ducks and many of the wading birds in
eastern Australia is 25 to 300 mm, and therefore a large area of shallow water is
required. This is often only provided when a farm dam overflows, but could well
be a feature in the construction of new dams. Periodic drying out and flooding of
this shallow water environment, with the subsequent growth of rank, ungrazed
grasses and herbs provide ideal conditions for the maximum production of duck
and more importantly, duckling food.
8.1.2 Basic topography
The edges of dams should be long and shallow, and retain as much topsoil and
vegetation as possible in an undisturbed condition. In addition, the ideal
waterfowl pondage should have a shelving margin. Waterbirds prefer to walk out
of the water to feed, rest, or reach a nesting site rather than to fly onto dry land.
The edge of the dam should be as irregular as possible, as the maximum use of the
margins is made by waterbirds for feeding and resting. Consequently, the longer
margin provided by an irregular edge to a dam may outweigh considerations of
the acreage of the dam.
A desirable feature of any waterbird pondage is the inclusion of a number of
islands, which provide excellent breeding and resting sites, even if they have
relatively steep edges. Islands afford protection from disturbance, particularly
from predators in the breeding season. Half-submerged logs, mud banks, or open
flat margins can provide other useful nesting sites.
8.1.3 Vegetation
Trees and shrubs can be used around farm dams to attract wildlife, especially
birds. To be fully effective, planting for habitat should be done in combination
with the provision of feeding and shelter sites. Shelterbelts near dams can also
provide shade for stock and reduce evaporation by lowering the wind speed at
ground level and decreasing surface temperatures. In addition, frog species favour
dam sites characterised by a high percentage of emergent vegetation in the dam,
low levels of bare ground in the immediately adjacent area, and a high percentage
of tree cover within an approximate 200 m radius of the dam site (Hazell et al.,
2001).
Trees and shrubs should be placed carefully to avoid problems occurring in the
future. Trees should never be planted on the dam embankment and spillway, or
near the outlets. Trees, shrubs and grasses should be established around the
margins, and up to the waterline, using native species wherever possible. River red
gum (E. camaldulensis) can be planted in shallow water or on land subject to
flooding, to provide shade, and eventually nesting habitat and shelter for some
species of waterbirds. However, care should be exercised in the selection and
placement of tree and shrub species. Too many tall trees around a small dam will
make it unattractive to waterbirds, particularly if these are across their normal
flight lane on and off the water. Low shrubs will afford birds better cover and
minimise interference with their flight pattern, although a few tall trees are still
needed.
The planting of food crops for waterfowl has proved successful overseas, but
there has been little investigation into this aspect of waterfowl management in
Australia (Cowling, 1967). Anecdotal evidence suggests that sufficient food
sources are provided from pasture and grain crops and by the flooding of most
native vegetation.
Raft
Log (floating island)
Flight path clear of trees
Low watermark
High watermark
Island
A variety of vegetation
large trees, small trees,
shrubs, herbs and No trees
grasses. A variety of on dam wall
species as well as size
is useful
Trees set back
from high watermark.
Only a few overhang
the water
Shoreline
vegetation
Full supply level Floating island
Fill embankment
b Arrowhead
Arrowhead is becoming increasingly prevalent in northern Victoria. Although it
has not spread as extensively as some plants, it has the ability to spread rapidly,
resulting in restriction to the flow of channels, drains and creeks. Arrowhead is an
erect plant which grows up to 1 m high. Its leaves are arrow shaped and are a
distinctive dull-green colour. Its flowers are white with yellow centres carried on
fleshy stems.
This plant is commonly found growing in shallow, slow-flowing creeks,
channels and drains. It spreads rapidly, forming dense clumps which slow water
flow significantly. Arrowhead reproduces by seed germination, underground
rhizomes (horizontal stems that put out roots and shoots), and bulbs which
remain viable in the soil for many years. Due to these various methods of
reproduction, it can be difficult to control this plant mechanically. Any rhizome or
root fragments left in the soil will result in a recurrence of the infestation.
Herbicides appear to be the only effective way to control this plant. Repeated
treatments are usually necessary because of the long germination period from
September to December. For herbicide rates, contact your nearest chemical supplier.
d Alligator weed
This perennial creeper has shiny, green leaves and white clover-like flowers. It
forms dense, floating or rooted mats up to 1 m depth, and also thrives on dry land
sites. It spreads by stem fragmentation.
Alligator weed is arguably the most destructive aquatic plant in Australia. At
present, it covers several thousand hectares of coastal New South Wales.
Biological control has been successful only in isolated situations. Overall there is
no control in river-banks or on other dry land sites.
e Water hyacinth
Water hyacinth continues to be a serious threat to waterways and storages
throughout Australia, but control measures and inspection programs undertaken
8.3.1 Hazards
Herbicide residues must be considered in relation to the use made of the water.
There are approved residue limits for most of the herbicides used near water, and
for a particular herbicide, the limit may vary depending on whether the water is
used for domestic purposes, agriculture or recreation, or if fish or their habitat are
of special significance to the area. In addition to choosing the herbicide that will
achieve the desired result, the user must ensure that it is applied in such a way that
the appropriate residue limit is not exceeded (Bill, 1985).
The degree of risk from herbicide residues in the water is determined by the
toxicity of the herbicide and by the concentration and persistence of herbicide
residues in the water. Plant decomposition following the use of a herbicide, and
de-oxygenation of the water which kills fish are indirect impacts of herbicide use.
Therefore, it is essential that the user be aware of these considerations.
Important points that should be observed when a herbicide is used near water
are summarised below.
• Use only a herbicide that is approved for the purpose and apply as directed on
the label and in accordance with conditions specified by the approving
authority.
• Identify the uses made of the water and ensure that the proposed herbicide
treatment does not affect those uses adversely, and that any residues of
herbicides in the water do not exceed approved limits.
• Where the water is used by the public, obtain approval for the proposed
herbicide treatment and notify people nearby of the nature of the treatment
and any restrictions on the use of the water.
8.5 Yabbies
There are many species of yabby or freshwater crayfish that can damage dam
walls by burrowing through the clay. Although it is commonly believed that
yabbies are responsible for damage to dam walls, they should not be blamed
automatically for all leaks or damage. Tree roots may also weaken the banks of
dams, and yabby holes seen outside the water are probably due to land yabbies,
which are different from the aquatic species. Increasingly, people are regarding
yabbies as a recreational and food resource and are glad to have them in their
dam. If you are sure aquatic yabbies are causing damage, you can take several
steps to reduce their numbers.
8.5.1 Physical removal
Constant yabbying may reduce the numbers sufficiently to prevent damage.
‘Dragging’ is probably the quickest method. This involves throwing a few pieces
of red meat into the dam to draw the yabbies out of their holes, then, with the help
of another person on the other side of the dam, slowly dragging a net through the
water.
8.5.2 Biological removal
Yabbies form part of the diet of some native fish. Stocking a dam with fish may
help reduce the numbers of yabbies but is unlikely to completely eradicate them.
Stocking with larger fish is preferable, as they are immediately physically capable
of eating the yabbies. Furthermore, their survival rate is proportionally higher
than smaller fish and as such likely to be ultimately more cost efficient. The
number of fish required is determined by the size of the fish and the area of water
surface, rather than the volume of water in the dam.
The best fish to use for reducing yabby numbers are golden perch (also called
callop or yellow belly), silver perch, or Murray cod. These fish are readily
available commercially. Redfin are no longer recommended as they have been
found to carry a disease harmful to trout, and their tendency to over-breed results
in too many small fish. However, they have a great preference for yabbies and can
tolerate a wide range of environmental conditions.
Exotic fish species such as brown and rainbow trout are also suitable, although
conditions in farm dams are usually unsuitable for trout to spawn. This means you
will have to re-stock at regular intervals to maintain the fish population. Trout
have a relatively fast growth rate and are a good sporting fish, but conditions for
their survival are critical. They need clear, cool water with a summer temperature
not exceeding 19°C, and at least one-third of the dam should be 2 m deep.
When only fry are available, a stocking rate of about 2500 per hectare is
necessary to allow for their expected high mortality. The stocking rate
recommended for yearling-size perch is about 250 to 350 per hectare.
More fish can be supported when the water quality, natural cover and
vegetation are all in good condition. However, for larger fish the stocking rate is
lower. An adequate natural food supply is needed to enable the fish to grow to a
size where they can eat the larger yabbies. It is therefore helpful to allow some
aquatic plants to grow around the water’s edge which, in turn, encourages small
invertebrates, such as mud eye, on which fish feed. The survival rate of fish will
be higher if a dam is managed for fish-eating birds such as cormorants.
It is important to remember that a permit is required from a State agency office
before purchasing the fish.
8.5.3 Chemical control
Chemical methods of eradicating yabbies, including manipulating water pH and
adding chlorine, are no longer recommended because of possible long-term
damage to aquatic ecosystems, and because they are not proven to be effective
control measures.
waterway after use. However, the discharge from these enterprises contains
nutrient-rich effluent which has water quality implications for waterways.
Eels are successfully and extensively farmed. Natural waters are stocked and
harvested using traditional commercial fishing methods. Most of the suitable
waters are now committed and there are possible limits on the supply of seed
stock. The opportunity for new enterprises is limited. There may be potential for
intensive eel farming on private land but there are many problems that have to be
solved before this method is viable.
Figure 9.2 Anguilla australis (Short Finned Eel)
Goldfish are grown for supply to the aquarium trade. Ventures in this area
have been amongst the most financially rewarding forms of fish farming, but the
market is now probably close to saturation. However, there may be room for
limited expansion in production of high quality, fancy strains.
800
700
600
Number of fish
500
400
Two-year-old
300 Mature yearling
200 Yearlings
Fingerlings
100 Fry
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Dam surface area (hectares)
Natural food supplies for fish within a dam come from two basic sources:
• terrestrial animals that find their way into the dam and are eaten by the fish;
and
• aquatic organisms that are part of the basic food chain within the dam.
The basis of the food chain in a dam is algae, which utilise available sunlight
and nutrients, such as phosphorus and nitrogen, to grow and breed. These algae
are consumed by other organisms in the dam that are in turn consumed by the
fish. The aim of sound aquaculture practices is to balance the numbers and size of
fish in a dam to optimise productivity. Unwanted algal growths, which can
produce low dissolved oxygen levels, can result from excessive nutrient inputs
from agricultural fertilisers, run-off from dairies or piggeries, or natural run-off
from basaltic catchments. High nutrient levels will ultimately lead to an
insufficient food supply, reduced growth rates and poor fish survival. High
stocking rates will also result in poor growth rates and poor survival.
Apart from embankment failure or loss of water through leakage, the biggest
threat to any fish dam is input of sediment. Erosion in the catchment from gullies,
over-cultivated or over-grazed fields and poorly vegetated hillslopes/valley
bottoms are all sources of sediments that are delivered to a dam. When sediments
flow into a dam, they settle to the bottom, thereby decreasing its depth and
capacity over time. In addition, sediment build-up within a dam may produce
increased pressure on the spillway, increased water temperatures in summer and
decreased productivity of the fish farm.
Some operators of fish farms suggest that trout require at least one-third of the
dam to be at least 2 m deep during summer, whilst native fish can survive when at
least one-third of the dam is 1.5 m deep. These numbers are a guide only, and can
be varied depending on climatic zone. The fish that thrive in similar waters in your
area are a good guide in selecting the most appropriate species for your dam.
9.1.3 Feeding
In correctly stocked dams, the natural food supply should be enough to support
the fish population. There are, at present, no adequately formulated artificial diets
for native fish, and trout will only eat floating or sinking pellets. Once pellets
reach the bottom they become, in the long term, very expensive fertiliser. However,
some dam owners like to feed pellets to trout which enables a rapid appraisal of
the numbers and size of the fish present in the dam. This approach needs to be
consistently managed to obtain meaningful results, so the fish need to be fed small
amounts at the same time and place.
9.1.4 Aquatic vegetation
Vegetation may be a food source for some of the organisms on which fish feed. It
can also provide shelter for both food organisms and fish. Most dams will develop
aquatic vegetation naturally, but shallow dams can be completely taken over.
Generally, no more than a third of the dam’s surface should be covered by
vegetation. When this is exceeded, control by physical removal is effective, but
care must be taken not to kill fish.
9.1.5 Fish loss by escaping
Migration of rainbow trout, golden perch and silver perch is more likely than
other species. If a dam overflows then it is very likely to lose fish, particularly once
they reach sexual maturity. It is, therefore, worthwhile to install an upward-
sloping screen, which extends well above maximum water level at the dam
overflow, and sloped in the direction of the water flow. This allows debris to be
pushed up onto the screen for regular cleaning off, or over the top, but prevents
fish from escaping. It is necessary to ensure that the size of the screen apertures are
small enough to prevent the smallest fish from passing through, that is, screen
apertures one-third the size of the cross-section of the fish’s body. Screens should
also be installed around all outlet pipes used to supply water for other purposes
such as irrigation or stock.
9.1.6 Muddy water
While most bodies of water will become turbid (cloudy) when they are stirred up
by wind or flowing water, they usually clear when conditions are stable. If a dam
remains turbid, it is most likely because of the type of clay present in the dam base
and wall. Some clay types produce what are known as colloidal particles in the
water. These are very small particles, which have similar electrical charges and
repel each other causing them to remain in suspension (see Section 6.3.1). There
are a number of chemicals that will neutralise these charges, allowing the particles
to settle (see Section 7.3).
9.1.7 Algae
Excessive algal growth can taint water, clog filters and valves, deplete oxygen
levels and kill stock. Algae increase in number by the action of sunlight on
nutrient-rich water. In the long term, control is achieved by reducing nutrient
input. This can be achieved by:
• diverting effluent from a dairy away from the dam;
• planting vegetation that will shade the dam in summer; or
• reducing run-off and associated erosion within the catchment.
Most chemical treatment for algae will kill fish and expert advice is required
before treating any water in the dam (see Section 7.4).
9.1.8 Other species
At different times, a number of species have been suggested as being suitable for
culture. Currently, it would appear that one or more factors make farming of them
uneconomical. Interstate or tropical species may be popular in some areas, but
they are not adapted to colder climates and cannot be economically grown in some
places. For example, tropical barramundi and prawns die, or grow extremely
slowly under cooler temperature conditions. Artificial heating is yet to be an
economical solution. Native fish that occur naturally in streams and lakes can
have traits that make them unsuitable for farming. Despite much interest and
effort, nobody, has developed an economical system of feeding and harvesting
table-sized golden perch, silver perch, freshwater catfish and Murray cod. Redfin
(English perch) carry a disease that also infects other species of fish. To ensure
quarantine, the movement of redfin stocks has been limited. They also have a
natural propensity to over-breed and over-stock, thereby producing under-size fish.
As a final disincentive to potential fish farmers, redfin attract only a poor price at
market.
Many species of freshwater crayfish are native to Australia but, while yabbies
show some potential for farming., other species of freshwater crayfish are not
suitable. Murray spiny crayfish, Gippsland spiny crayfish, Glenelg River spiny
crayfish and the giant Tasmanian crayfish grow too slowly to be commercially
attractive. It may take a decade for a crop to reach market size. The Western
Australian Marron is declared a noxious fish in Victoria and the tropical red claw
crayfish carries diseases.
If some Asian fish species were to escape, they could have the potential to
become pests. To conserve freshwater ecology these species have also been made
noxious in most States of Australia and cannot be farmed.
reasonable profit for very little effort can still be expected even if they are
harvested by the reseller.
While it seems possible that yabby farming may become a viable industry, it is
unlikely that the potential financial returns are as great as some promoters state.
The technology is simple but yabby farming can be labour intensive and requires
good fish husbandry skills. To make a profit, good business skills are also required.
Landowners that grow yabbies for sale are required in most States of Australia
to have a Fish Culture Permit/Licence. Anyone contemplating the farming of
yabbies should check this out with the responsible State authorities that manage
fisheries and/or wildlife.
Figure 9.4 Cherax destructor (Yabby)
from a nearby waterway you must obtain a Diversion Licence from the
responsible authority, as stated under the legislation of the State. A separate
licence may also be required for any necessary in-stream works (Lewis and
Branson, 1996; Lewis and Beavis, 2001).
d Other authorities
Other approvals in regard to the location and operation of a commercial
enterprise will be needed from relevant authorities including the local shire
council, conservation authorities, and any river management authorities. Once all
these authorities have been contacted, you must arrange a joint inspection of your
proposed site.
9.4.2 Other steps that may need to be taken
In addition to the permits and licences already described, it may be necessary to
obtain the following:
i A planning permit from the local shire council;
ii A fish culture licence from your local conservation or wildlife authority;
iii An occupancy licence from the appropriate authority, if any part of the
proposed works is to be located on Crown Land; and
iv Approval for in-stream works from any local river management authority, if
such an authority exists in your area (check with your shire office).
Table 10.1 Key Federal, State and Local Government legislation on farm dams
Act/Policy/Program Impact on farm dam management
Federal
Income Tax Assessment Act, 1936 Provides incentives for dam development through
tax write-offs for investment in bona fide storages,
and drought investment allowances.
National Landcare Program (NLP) Grants provide proportion of funds for projects,
including dams for drought proofing and erosion
control.
State
Tasmania Water Act, 1983 Licenses on-stream dams and controls water
diversion and use.
Environmental Management and Environmental Impact Assessment required for
Pollution Control Act, 1996 large on-stream dams.
Farm Dam Working Group Assessment of licence applications on basis of
impacts on fisheries and ecosystems.
Farm Dam Development Plan Provision of financial incentives to farmers
(low interest loans and subsidies for consultants’
advice).
Victoria Water Act, 1989 Right to flow of water, applications for licences and
authority, and water allocation.
Special Water Supply Catchment Approval for farm dams within Special WSC Areas
Areas required from Dept Natural Resources and
Environment.
South Australia Water Resources Act, 1990 Riparian rights, applications for licences for dams
(currently being revised as Water on proclaimed waterways, and water allocation.
Resources Bill, 1996)
Development Act, 1993 Development authorisation required for specific
dam applications according to size and location
(including ‘local heritage places’, waterway and
flood-zones, and flood plains).
Waterworks Act, 1932 Consent of the Minister is required for dams in the
Adelaide Hills catchment.
Draft Surface Water Allocation Addresses environmental issues relating to farm
Policy dam development. Will include a Surface Water
Management Plan.
Queensland Water Act, 2000 Replaces the 1994 Dam Safety Management
Guidelines.
Environmental Protection Act, 1994 Applies to dams containing ‘hazardous waste’ such
as tailing dams and contaminated water
containment dams.
Water Resources Act, 1989 Relates to permits that originated from existing
dams, waterworks licences.
Western Australia Rights in Water and Irrigation Act, Right of flow of water, applications for licences and
1914 allocation of water.
The legislation and policies that exist are specific in the level of control on
further development and the environmental requirements during design and siting.
Increasingly, farmers cannot construct dams in an ad hoc manner, particularly in
rural residential areas, and where environmental considerations are enforced.
However, decisions are at the discretion of local officers of State agencies and local
governments without standardised procedures on a broad scale (Beavis and
Howden, 1996).
This outline demonstrates that the legal and policy framework, which applies
to farm dam management, is variable. While there is considerable scope for
interpretation by farmers on the construction, design, siting and management of a
dam, there are also specific associated tax benefits, costs, and constraints, which
must be considered in order to profit from such an investment. Furthermore, it is
important to note that in their present form the Acts listed above do not appear
to have had significant impact on the actual management of farm dams.
The immediate questions that arise are those which address the relevance and
effectiveness of such legislation, policies and regulations in ensuring that future
farm dam development meets standards set to preserve water quality and river
health. Clearly, policy development needs to address the mismatch between
policies for dam construction and those relating to water for the environment.
This approach will optimise policy alignment and disable the current antagonistic
system of incentives and constraints on farm dams.
10.2 Liability
Liability in specific instances very much depends upon the dam, the accident, the
owner and the State jurisdiction in which the dam is located (US FEMA, 1987).
The liability of an owner, designer or contractor of a dam is considered general
civil liability (tort). A tort is simply a civil wrong for which an injured party may
recover damages from the responsible party. In most circumstances, simply
causing damage is not a sufficient basis for the imposition of liability. An element
of negligence must accompany the injury before liability is incurred. However,
negligence is not a fixed concept. It has been modified and changed by legal
precedence over time. In the simplest terms, it has been described as the violation
of a duty to act as a reasonable and prudent person would act; a violation which
directly results in damage to another.
The question of what ‘duty of care’ is imposed by society and what standard of
reasonable care is imposed by the duty has undergone scrutiny and changed over
time. In many instances, the duty to make a dam safe or the duty to ensure that
one’s property does not pose a danger to others, has been significantly increased.
While the concept of negligence has been broadened, changes in the limits of
negligence do not directly affect dam owners because a separate basis of liability
has long been imposed upon them. This standard is one of ‘strict liability’. Strict
liability is not based upon fault or negligence, rather it is based solely upon
resulting damage, regardless of fault. Strict liability is generally applied to those
activities that are deemed ‘ultra-hazardous’ and not capable of being rendered
reasonably safe.
The situation of strict liability was first established in a case involving a dam
in 1866 in England, Fletcher v. Rylands (L.R.1 Ex 265, 279–280). A dam was built
in the vicinity of abandoned coal mines. The water from the dam found its way
into the abandoned shafts and from there into active shafts and resulted in
damage. Under present legal thought, the basis of liability for such an occurrence
may well be negligent design because of failure to adequately investigate the
surrounding circumstances when the dam was built. In this decision, it was
assumed that no one could have known the abandoned mine shafts existed and
specifically decided that the owner was not negligent. Nonetheless, the court at
that time, established the concept of strict liability for dam owners, and the owner
of the dam was found to be liable for the escape of water from the dam, regardless
of fault.
Thus, with a very limited number of exceptions, the general statement of
liability for the owner or operator of a dam can relate back to a statement by
Henry Manisty QC, who addressed the English Court of the Exchequer in 1866:
“A large collection of water is a thing pregnant with dangers, and it
behoves anyone who makes a collection for his profit, to be aware
how he may prejudice his neighbour by mismanaging it.”
Since that time this was known as the Fletcher v. Rylands rule. This is now held
by the High Court to have no place in Australian law, based on the precedent:
Burnie Port Authority vs. General Jones (1994) HCA.
Strict liability has two exceptions:
• acts of God—natural occurrences over which the owner has no control. While
acts of God are recognised as a defence, this is limited to those events over
which the owner had no control and also which the owner could not, using
available expertise, have anticipated.
• intentional acts of third parties—was established in the United States of
America, Wyoming Supreme Court in the Wheatland case. In this case it was
asserted that the dam had been damaged by saboteurs, and the Court
recognised that illegal, intentional acts by third parties which the owner could
not protect against or reasonably foresee were a viable defence to strict liability
(FEMA, 1987).
In summary, existing law holds a dam owner to the highest standard of care.
Pending legislation may limit liability in certain circumstances, but the general
statement remains unchanged. The owner is liable for all damages caused by water
escaping from a dam—despite the best efforts of the owner.
ii A wall that is ten (10.0) metres or more high above ground level at the
downstream end of the dam, and a capacity of 20 megalitres or more.
(1 megalitre = 1000 cubic metres).
For further details see DWR, 1987 Reports No. 3, 4 and 5; DWR, 1989 Report
No. 43; DSC, 1996 and ANCOLD, 1998.
In New South Wales, a new Farm Dams Policy was introduced in 1999. If a
landowner intends to construct a farm dam, the Farm Dams Assessment Guide
(accessible on the NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation (DLWC)
website) provides a method to estimate 10 per cent of the mean annual run-off for
the region in which the land is located (see references L&WC, 1999). This is the
harvestable right, and refers to the amount of run-off generated from a property
that the landowner has a right to harvest without a licence.
If a licence is required (because the landowner needs to use more than the
harvestable right) for water use other than for stock or domestic purposes, the
landowner needs to find out if an embargo is in place within the district or region.
If so, then a licence can only be obtained by purchasing someone else’s entitlement.
Under these conditions, the landowner needs to contact the DLWC for advice.
If the area is not embargoed then the procedure of obtaining a licence is
straightforward. Application forms, including an environmental questionnaire,
from the DLWC need to be completed and submitted with a lodgement fee.
Processing of the licence by the DLWC involves:
• reviewing environmental impacts;
• advertising the application in the local area; and
• resolving objections, if they arise.
If approved, a fee is required, which will vary according to the intended use.
The licence may have conditions applied in relation to environmental impacts
and/or objections.
In populated areas calls should be made first to the police or the State Emergency
Service (SES) who will then warn and if necessary, evacuate downstream residents.
In rural areas, the warning will usually be given by telephone or direct contact
with the nearest downstream residents. When telephone conversation is not
possible, the person observing the dangerous condition may have to personally
warn the nearest downstream residents, campers, and so on. Therefore, the owner
should keep a listing of the nearest downstream residents and their phone
numbers.
Neighbours
1 ………….
2. …………
3. ………….
Local Organisations
1. Police
2. Shire or Council
3. State Emergency Service (SES)
4. RWA Regional Office
State Organisations
1. State Emergency Service (SES)
2. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
3. Rural Water Authority
4. State Roads Authority
5. State Electricity Authority
Source: DC&NR, 1992.
conducted the establishment, did owe a duty of care to the plaintiff but that that
duty had not been breached. All members of the Court of Appeal took into
account the fact that it would have been very expensive to redesign the jail in
question—and by extension of the argument, all the jails in New South Wales—to
prevent the type of injury which had occurred. They emphasised that even
governments have limited resources and must make choices on the basis of the
overall common good.
The proprietors and designers of large dams are not the insurers at law of those
who may suffer physical or economic harm should something go wrong.
Nonetheless, the boundaries of the law of negligence are being pushed wider all
the time, and because of the extreme consequences which would follow a dam
failure or over-topping, a very high standard of care will be imposed upon such
persons (McMullan, 1995). Therefore, dam owners and designers must assess
carefully the risks involved in the design and maintenance of such structures, and
take particular care to ensure that risks, even if mathematically quite small, are
minimised or managed.
The law of contract is also largely concerned with the enforcement of duties
that one person has, by agreement, bound himself or herself to perform for the
benefit of another. The law of torts (civil wrong) may also be seen to be concerned
with breaches of duties. Those duties are not established by any agreement
between persons but rather by the law itself. Thus there are, for example, duties
not to assault another person, not to trespass on another’s land, not to take
another’s goods, and to take care not to injure one’s neighbour. Some duties are
laid down by legislation; others are found in what is known as the common law,
that is the rules that judges recognised in the past as being necessary to enable
society to function as harmoniously as possible and which judges still recognise.
A glossary of terminology
The water industry has embraced engineers, scientists, educationalists, farmers as
well as people from other disciplines. A range of terminology is used to describe
some of the physical and scientific processes required to deliver water to farms.
While some are self-explanatory or are commonly used within the water industry
worldwide, others have evolved locally.
Abandonment Indicates that the dam is no longer used and no longer stores
water. It has been modified hydraulically and/or structurally
to ensure complete and permanent safety to life, property
and the environment. It should require no further operation,
maintenance, surveillance or remedial work.
Abutment The natural ground formation between the base of the dam
and its crest. The natural material below the excavation
surface and in the immediate surrounding formation above
the normal river level or flood plain against which the ends
of the dam are placed.
Appurtenant Works Include, but are not limited to, such structures as spillways,
either in or beside the dam and its rim; low level outlet works
and water conduits such as tunnels, pipelines, either through
the dam or its abutments.
Aquifer A water-bearing layer of rock or material or sediment below
the natural surface within which water is transmitted and
can be removed by pumping.
Base of Dam The foundation area of the lowest part of the main body of
the dam, the portion excluding the abutments. The base
elevation is considered to be at the lowest foundation level of
a substantial section of the dam. It excludes isolated pockets
of excavation which are not representative of the base
extending from heel to toe.
Beaching Rocks placed to dissipate the erosive force of waves on
banks. The term can mean dumped rocks, usually on a
prepared filter bed.
Bed The part of a waterway or channel that is usually or
normally covered with water when it is flowing.
Foundation The material of the valley floor and abutments on which the
dam is constructed.
Freeboard The vertical distance between the design flood level and the
top of the dam.
Full Supply Level The level of the water when the dam is at maximum
operating level, excluding times of flood discharge. When a
controlled spillway is provided, it is the spillway crest level.
Groundwater The segment of water below the natural surface of the
ground at a pressure equal to or greater than atmospheric.
Height of Dam The difference in level between the natural bed of the stream
or waterway at the downstream toe of the bank and the top
of the dam. If it is not across a stream, channel or waterway
it is the difference in level between the lowest elevation of the
outside limit of the bank and the top of the dam. See
definition ‘Top of Dam’.
In some instances where a dam has a free-overflow spillway
only or has a controlled spillway, it may be difficult to define
the top of dam level as the normal abutment sections may
not exist. In such cases the height is to be measured to the
level arrived at by adding the design flood rise in water level
to the level of the spillway crest, or to the full supply level.
Large Dam The minimum requirements adopted for determining
whether a large dam qualifies for inclusion in the ICOLD
World Register of Dams are as follows:
All dams above 15 metres (50 feet) in height, measured from
the lowest portion of the general foundation area to the top
of the dam.
Dams between 10 metres (33 feet) and 15 metres (50 feet) are
included, provided they comply with at least one of the
following conditions:
(a) The length of the crest, i.e. the top of the dam, to be not
less than 500 metres (1600 feet).
(b) The capacity of the reservoir formed by the dam to be not
less than 1 000 000 cubic metres (35 million cubic feet or 800
acre-feet).
(c) The maximum flood discharge dealt with by the dam to
be not less than 2000 cubic metres per second (70 000 cusecs).
(d) If the dam has specifically difficult foundation problems.
(e) If the dam is of unusual design.
Maintenance The routine work required to maintain existing works and
systems (mechanical, electrical, hydraulic and civil) in a safe
and functional condition.
Monitoring The observation and recording of data from measuring
devices to check the performance and behavioural trends of
a dam and appurtenant structures.
Outlet Works The combination of intake structure, screen, conduits,
tunnels and gate-valve meters that permit water to be
discharged under control from the dam.
well experienced in the field of small dam engineering, who has academic
qualifications acceptable for corporate membership of the Institution of
Engineers Australia and who is considered experienced in small dam
engineering.
Plans
7 The following plans (to be attached) shall form part of this Specification.
Survey marks for setting out works
8 A level benchmark has been established close to the site of the works and is
shown on Plan Number___________. The reduced level of this benchmark is
E.L__________, this being an arbitrary datum and shall be used as a
permanent reference for levels during the construction and maintenance of the
works and for calculating the accuracy of the works.
9 The Contractor must not move or disturb the benchmark in any way prior to
or during the construction of the works unless prior approval is given by the
Engineer.
10 The location of pegs and other reference features for the setting out of the new
embankment centre-line and for the location of ancillary works are shown on
Plan Number _________. The new embankment centre-line and ancillary
works are to be located relative to these pegs and other reference features in
accordance with the dimensions shown on the Plans.
Clearing and grubbing
11 The area to be covered by the embankment, borrow pits and incidental works,
together with an area extending beyond the limits of each for a distance of
seven (7) metres all round shall be cleared of all trees, scrub, stumps, roots,
dead timber and rubbish and the same shall be removed from the vicinity of
the work and burned or otherwise disposed of in a manner approved by the
Engineer.
12 The area to be covered by the stored water outside the limits of the borrow
pits shall be cleared of all scrub and rubbish. Trees shall be cut down stump
high and removed from the vicinity of the work.
13 All trees near the site which are likely to damage or obstruct work in any way
shall be cut down stump high or root felled as directed, and removed from the
vicinity of the work.
14 All holes made by grubbing within the area to be covered by the embankment
shall be filled with sound material and well compacted to finish flush with the
natural surface.
Removal of topsoil for use in the embankment
15 Before construction of the cut-off trench or of any ancillary works within the
embankment area, all grass growth and topsoil shall be removed from the area
to be occupied by the embankment and shall be deposited clear of this area
and reserved for use in completing the embankment and spillway.
16 All topsoil within the borrow pit excavation area, including the spillway, shall
likewise be removed clear of the excavation and embankment areas and shall
be reserved for use in completing the embankment and spillway.
Cut-off trench
17 Where directed, because of any doubt as to the nature of existing materials
forming the foundation of the embankment, a cut-off trench extending down-
wards into a sufficiently impervious formation, shall be excavated. The cut-off
trench shall extend for the full length of the embankment and beyond where
shown on plan, until a continuous impervious zone is encountered extending
to above top water level. The minimum width of the cut-off trench shall be
three (3) metres unless otherwise indicated.
18 All water, loose soil, and rock shall be removed from the trench before
backfilling commences. The cut-off trench shall be backfilled with selected
earth-fill of the type specified for the embankment, and this soil shall have a
moisture content and degree of compaction the same as that specified for the
selected core zone.
19 Material excavated from the cut-off trench is to be used in the embankment if
suitable, provided it is placed in the correct zone according to its classification.
Otherwise unsuitable material shall be disposed of as directed by the Engineer.
Selection and placing of material for embankment zones
20 Suitable material from within the storage area, or from borrow pit if sufficient
suitable material is not available from within the storage area, shall be used to
construct the embankment. Earth-fill shall be placed longitudinally in
progressive horizontal layers of uniform thickness of not more than two
hundred (200) millimetres before compacting, inclusive of the depth of loose
fill at the top of the preceding layer.
21 Where the earth-fill materials vary in permeability and/or moisture content,
the embankment shall be constructed with an impervious core zone flanked by
outer zones of semi pervious earth-fill as shown on the plans.
22 The core zone shall extend for the full length of the embankment and shall be
built up and compacted to the dimensions shown on the plans. Where a cut-
off trench is used the core zone shall be continuous with the compacted fill in
the cut-off for the full width of the top of the cut-off fill.
23 Where both dispersive and non-dispersive classified earth-fill materials are
available, non-dispersive earth-fill shall be used in the core zone. The outer
zones shall be built of the remaining classified earth-fill materials with the
most permeable materials being placed in the downstream outer zone.
24 No silt, sand, stones over 75 millimetres diameter, surface soil, tree roots,
organic matter, or other material, which will not compact properly, shall be
used in the embankment except where shown on plans for special purposes.
25 Excavated material which, in the opinion of the Engineer, is not suitable for
use in the embankment, shall be dumped in spoil banks clear of the works as
directed.
26 During construction the Contractor shall maintain the embankment in a free
draining condition in a manner satisfactory to the Engineer and no part of the
work shall be carried up more than 0.6 metres higher than any other part.
Work shall be suspended whenever, in the opinion of the Engineer, it cannot
be carried out satisfactorily owing to the fill becoming too wet.
27 When outlet pipes pass through fill material, this material shall be compacted
up to a level of 0.6 metres above the intended crown of the pipe. If the pipe is
to be laid in undisturbed foundation material and will be less than 0.6 metres
below the level of the stripped site, the laying of the pipe shall be delayed until
the fill material above the pipe reaches a level at least 0.6 metres over the
crown of the pipe. The trenches for the pipes will then be excavated as
described in the relevant clauses of the Specification and the pipes and any
protective concrete placed in position. The trench shall then be backfilled with
approved material and satisfactorily compacted by pneumatic rammer or
mechanical hand tampers in not more than 100 millimetres (loose) layers to
the satisfaction of the Engineer until the cover over the pipe is at least 0.6
metres. The placing of backfill in trenches, when protective concrete
surrounding the pipe has been placed, shall not commence until the concrete
has cured for such times as may be determined by the Engineer. When no
concrete surround is specified particular care shall be taken to avoid damage
to the pipes or protective pipe coating.
Compaction tests
31 Before the commencement of compaction and from time to time thereafter, the
Contractor will receive notification from the Engineer as to the maximum dry
density of the fill material as determined by the laboratory compaction tests.
The desired degree of compaction is 95% of the maximum dry density as
notified by the Engineer.
32 When the first layer of fill material has been spread and rolled the Engineer
may, in order to carry out compaction tests, direct the Contractor to
discontinue placing material over this compacted layer for a period not
exceeding 24 hours.
33 The Contractor will subsequently be called upon to discontinue work, for
reasons associated with testing of materials, only if other excavated material
differs significantly from this tested first layer of fill.
Moisture content
34 Before commencement of compaction, and from time to time during
construction of the bank, tests for moisture content will be carried out by the
Engineer on the basis of the Standard Drop Test or other tests.
35 The Contractor will receive notification from the Engineer as to the optimum
moisture content for compaction for each type of material as determined by
the tests. The allowable tolerance of moisture content shall be plus or minus
two per cent (+ or –2%) of the optimum moisture content as established by
tests carried out in accordance with Australian Standard 1289—‘Method of
Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes’.
36 Material, which in the Engineer’s opinion is too damp for compaction, shall
be allowed to dry out to a moisture content satisfactory to the Engineer before
rolling is commenced or continued, or such material shall be removed at the
Contractor’s expense.
37 If material is too dry for compaction, it shall be watered at the direction of the
Engineer. This shall be by sprinkling in place on the earth-fill, or, if practicable,
by sprinkling the material in the excavation.
Completion
48 The embankment and spillway shall be completed in every respect including
neat trimming to correct lines and levels in accordance with this Specification
and the accompanying plans. The works area shall be left in a clean and tidy
condition at the completion of the work.
Mass
pounds (lb) 0.453 592 370 kilogram (kg) 2.204 620 pounds (lb)
ton (ton) 1.016 046 900 tonne (t) 0.984 207 ton (ton)
pounds per foot (lb/ft) 1.488 160 kilograms per metre (kg/m) 0.671 969 pounds per foot (lb/ft)
Flow rates
feet cubed per second (ft3/s) 0.028 316 800 metres cubed per second (m3/s) 35.314 700 feet cubed per second (ft3/s)
feet cubed per second (ft3/s) 2.446 575 500 megalitres per day (ML/d) 0.408 734 600 feet cubed per second (ft3/s)
gallons per minute (gal/min) 0.075 768 200 litres per second (L/s) 13.198 155 gallons per minute (gal/min)
gallons per minute (gal/min) 0.006 546 400 megalitres per day (ML/d) 152.756 420 gallons per minute (gal/min)
million gallons per day (mgd) 52.616 782 400 litres per second (L/s) 0.019 005 300 million gallons per day (mgd)
million gallons per day (mgd) 4.546 090 megalitres per day (ML/d) 0.219 969 millon gallons per day (mgd)
acre feet per day (ac.ft/day) 1.233 481 800 megalitres per day (ML/d) 0.810 713 acre feet per day (ac.ft/day)
megalitres per day (ML/d) 0.011 574 metres cubed per second (m3/s)
metres cubed per second (m3/s) 86.400 megalitres per day (ML/d)
Force
tons per inch square (ton/in2) 15.444 300 megapascals 0.064 748 800 tons per inch square (ton/in2)
pounds/inch square (lb/in2) 6.894 760 kilopascals 0.145 037 700 pounds/inch square (lb/in2)
tons per foot square (ton/ft2) 107.252 kilopascals 0.009 324 tons per foot square (ton/ft2)
pounds/foot square (lb/ft2) 47.880 300 pascals (newtons per metre2) 0.020 885 pounds/foot square (lb/ft2)
Velocity
feet per second (ft/s) 26.334 720 kilometres per day (km/day) 0.037 973 feet per second (ft/s)
Power
horsepower (hp) 0.745 700 kilowatt (kW) 1.341 020 horsepower (hp)
foot pound per second (ftlb/s) 1.355 820 watt (W) 0.737 562 foot pound per second (ftlb/s)
Source: Modified from SR&WSC, 1973.
References
Albright and Wilson (1990). Technical bulletin on ‘Albrite’, a range of sodium
tripolyphosphates, STPP, which is used in certain types of soils as an
additive to minimise dam leaks.
ANCOLD (1983). Guidelines on assessment of the consequences of dam failure.
Australian National Committee on Large Dams, AGPS, Canberra.
ANCOLD (1992). Guidelines on dam safety management. First draft, May 1992.
Australian National Committee on Large Dams, AGPS, Canberra.
ANCOLD (1998). Guidelines on assessment of the consequences of dam failure.
(July 1998), AGPS, Canberra.
ANZECC (1992). National water quality management strategy. Australian and
New Zealand Environmental and Conservation Council.
Barlow, C. C. and Bock, K. (1984). Predation of fish in farm dams by cormorants,
Phalacrocorax spp. Australian Wildlife Research, 11: 559–566.
Beavis, S. G. and Howden, S.M. (1996). Effects of farm dams on water. National
Land Care Program funded project, Bureau of Rural Sciences, unpublished
report.
Beavis, S. G. and Lewis, B. (1999). The impact of farm dam development on water
resources due to catchment yield. Proceedings of the Water 99 Joint
Congress of the Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium and Second
International Conference on Water Resources and Environment Research,
6–8 July 1999, Brisbane, pp. 465–469.
Beavis, S. G. and Lewis, B. (2001). The impact of farm dams on the management
of water resources within the context of total catchment development.
Proceedings of the Third Australian Stream Management Conference: The
value of healthy streams, 27–29 August 2001, Brisbane, Queensland,
pp. 23–27.
Bill, S. M. (1985). Using herbicides near water. Water Talk, No. 53, Rural Water
Commission, Victoria.
Nelson, K. D. (1983). Farm water supplies: a survey. Water Talk, No. 49, January
1983, p. 3.
Nelson, K. D. (1985). Design and construction of small earth dams. Melbourne,
Inkata Press, Melbourne.
O’Brien T., Perera, S. and Lewis, B. (1999). Providing for fish passage at small
instream structures. Proceedings of Second International Conference on
Water Resources & Environment Research, July 99, Brisbane. Queensland.
Powling, I. J. (1990). Algae in water. Water Talk, No. 39 Rural Water
Commission, Victoria.
Romanowski, N. (1994). Farming in ponds and dams—an introduction to
freshwater aquaculture in Australia. Lothian, Melbourne
SCA (1979). Guidelines for minimising soil erosion and sedimentation from
construction sites in Victoria. Compiled under the guidance of R. J. Garvin,
M. R. Knight and T. J. Richmond. Soil Conservation Authority.
SCA (1983). Farm water supply manual collated by B. Garrett (unpublished). Soil
Conservation Authority.
SCS USDA (1967). A supplement to the Soil Classification System that was
adapted by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Soil Conservation Service,
United States Department of Agriculture.
SCS USDA (1969). Engineering field manual for conservation practices. Soil
Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, USA.
SR&WSC (1970a). Farm water supplies: practical advice on making the most of
available water. State Rivers and Water Supply Commission, Victoria.
SR&WSC (1970b). Series of pamphlets on water quality. State Rivers and Water
Supply Commission, Victoria.
SR&WSC (1973). Metric conversion tables. State Rivers and Water Supply
Commission, Victoria.
SRW (1995). A series of farm dam pamphlets by B. Lewis that provides
information advice on building and maintaining a farm dam. Each
pamphlet is numbered 1 to 21. Southern Rural Water, Victoria.
Stephens, T. (1991). Handbook on small earth dams and weirs: a guide to
sighting, design and construction. Cranfield Institute of Technology,
Cranfield Press, UK.
USDA (1969). Engineering field manual for conservation practices. United States
Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
US-FEMA (1987). Dam safety: an owner’s guidance manual. United States Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
WAWA (1991). Guidelines for the design and construction of small farm dams
(Category 2) in the Warren Lefroy Rivers Area. Water Authority of Western
Australia.
Wensley, R. (1995). Dam safety management towards 2000, legal implications.
Gutteridge Haskins & Davey Pty Ltd Seminar on 16 August 1995.
Further reading
ANCOLD (1976). Guidelines for operation, maintenance and surveillance of
dams. Australian National Committee on Large Dams.
ANCOLD (1986). Guidelines on design floods for dams. Australian National
Committee on Large Dams.
Andrews, C. and Carrington, N. (1988). The manual of fish health. Salamander
Books.
Bell, F. G. (1980). Engineering geology and geotechnics news. Butterworth,
London.
Cadwallader, P. L. and Backhouse, G. N. (1983). A guide to the freshwater fish of
Victoria. Government Printing Office on behalf of the Fisheries and Wildlife
Division, Ministry for Conservation, Melbourne.
Caterpillar (1980). Caterpillar performance handbook, Edition 11. USA.
Chanson, H. (1999). Hydraulics of open channel flow. Butterworth Heinemann,
UK.
DWR (1989). Water Victoria—an environmental handbook. Department of Water
Resources, Victoria.
GH&D (1987). A report to the Department of Water Resources Victoria: farm
dams in catchment study. Gutteridge, Haskins & Davey.
Lewis, B. (1991). Inspecting a dam with the experts. Aqua, Vol. 1, Issue 1,
Autumn 1991, pp. 10–11.
Lewis, B. and Branson, G. (1996). Licensing of aquaculture developments in
Victoria. Twenty-third Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium
Proceedings, Hobart, May 1996, pp. 343–349.
Merrick, J. R. and Lambert, C. N. (1991). The yabby, marron and redclaw.
Merrick Publications.
NR&M QLD (2001). Safety management guidelines for referable dams (draft).
Natural Resources and Mines, Queensland Government.
Papworth, M. and Lewis, B. (2001). Some thoughts on humans and waterways.
Proceedings of the Third Australian Stream Management Conference: the
value of healthy streams, 27–29 August 2001, Brisbane, Queensland,
pp. 501–506.
QWRC (1980). Farm water supplies. Design charts for: earthworks, pipes,
pumps, channels, spillways, drainage, irrigation and water quality.
Queensland Water Resource Commission.
QWRC (1984). Farm water supplies design manual, Vol. 1, edited by A. J. Horton
and G. A. Jobling. Farm Water Supplies Section, Irrigation Branch,
Queensland Water Resource Commission.
RWC (1988). Irrigation and drainage practice. A text on the design practices that
should be used in the management of water supplies. Rural Water
Commission, Armadale, Victoria.
Sainty, G. R. and Jacobs, S. W. L. (1994). Waterplants in Australia. 3rd edn.
CSIRO, Australia, Division of Water Resources.
SCA (1972). Course notes for training course no. 38 at Mildura Victoria on Farm
water reticulation. 26 June 1972. Limited circulation. Soil Conservation
Authority.
SCA (1974). Compaction of soils. Soil engineering training course. Unpublished
report. Soil Conservation Authority.
Southorn, N. (1995). Farm water supplies: planning and installation. Inkata Press,
Reed International Books, Australia.
TADS (1990). Training aids for dam safety. Module on inspection of embankment
dams. Manual developed by the United States Interagency Steering
Committee of Federal and States.
USDA (1980). Guide for safety evaluation and periodic inspection of existing
dams. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Services and Soil
Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
Williams, W. D. (1980). Australian freshwater life. Macmillan.