The document discusses theories about the formation and evolution of the universe and planetary systems. It describes the Big Bang theory, which states that the universe began in a hot, dense state and has been expanding ever since. It also covers the steady state theory, which claims the universe has no beginning or end, and the cosmic inflation theory, proposing a brief period of rapid expansion after the Big Bang. Regarding planetary formation, it discusses the nebular hypothesis of planets forming from a rotating gas cloud, and planetesimal and tidal theories involving gravitational interactions stripping matter from stars.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
100%(1)100% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views26 pages
MODULE 1 Formation of The Universe
The document discusses theories about the formation and evolution of the universe and planetary systems. It describes the Big Bang theory, which states that the universe began in a hot, dense state and has been expanding ever since. It also covers the steady state theory, which claims the universe has no beginning or end, and the cosmic inflation theory, proposing a brief period of rapid expansion after the Big Bang. Regarding planetary formation, it discusses the nebular hypothesis of planets forming from a rotating gas cloud, and planetesimal and tidal theories involving gravitational interactions stripping matter from stars.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 26
MODULE 1
THE ORIGIN AND SYSTEMS OF EARTH
THEORIES ABOUT THE FORMATION OF THE UNIVERSE BIG BANG THEORY The Big Bang Theory remains to be the prevailing cosmological model for the early development of the universe. According to the big bang theory, the universe was once very small and very hot, and then it expanded over time until it reached its peak (which may be perceived as a massive explosion for some) around 13.7 billion years ago (considered the age of the universe). The big bang model also asserts that seconds after the explosion, the surroundings were at a high temperature of about 10 billion degrees Fahrenheit (5.5 billion Celsius) with aggregates of fundamental particles such as neutrons, electrons, and protons. As the universe cooled in later phases, these particles either combined with each other or decayed. The universe was also said to continue to expand over the next 12 billion years until the present. STEADY STATE THEORY STEADY STATE THEORY
The Steady State Theory was first proposed by Sir James
Jeans (1877-1946) in 1920. It gained popularity after it was revised by Fred Hoyle (1915-2001), Herman Bondi (1919-2005), and Thomas Gold (1920-2004) in 1948 as an alternative to the Big Bang Theory. This theory further claims that the universe has no beginning or end in time, and even though it is expanding, its appearance remains the same over time. However, toward the 1960’s, much evidence was produced that would contradict the steadiness or the unchanging state of the universe. When certain galaxies were found only at far distances in space, it just disprove the idea that similar bodies are created and found everywhere. Thisimplies that the universe is actually evolving (and not steady). COSMIC INFLATION THEORY COSMIC INFLATION THEORY The most recent cosmic inflation theory was proposed by physicists Alan Guth (1947-present) and Andrei Linde (1948- present) in the 1980’s. The term inflation refers to the rapid expansion of space-time. According to this theory, the early universe was a rapidly expanding bubble of pure vacuum energy. It did not have any matter or radiation. After the expansion and cooling arising from this inflation, the potential energy converted into kinetic energy of matter and radiation. 1. Homogeneity of object in space
During the expansion period, objects that used to be in
contact got far away from one another. Their composition, however, remained almost intact. 2. Appearance of flatness or smoothness
Thecontinuous expansion “dilutes” or gradually loses
the curvature of objects. 3. The formation of stars and star systems in later years
The theory asserts that during expansion, small density
fluctuations happen. This causes gravity to attract gas into masses, giving birth to stars and eventually galaxies. This also explains why the universe would always look full of planetary objects instead of appearing completely empty. FORMATION OF STAR SYSTEMS NEBULAR HYPOTHESIS Nebular Hypothesis The nebular hypothesis was develop by Immanuel Kant (1724- 1804) and Pierre-Simon Laplace (1749-1827) in the 18th century. It was the model used to explain the formation and evolution of the solar system. It presuppose that around 4.6 billion years ago, a star system was formed from a rotating gas cloud or nebula of extremely hot gas. When the gas cooled, the nebula began to shrink, and as it became smaller, it rotated faster, forming a disk like shape. The angular momentum from the nebula’s rotation and the gravitational force from the mass of the nebula formed the rings of gas outside. As the nebula continued to shrink, these rings condensed into various densities of planets and their satellites. The remaining part of the nebula, which had the most mass, formed the sun. PLANETESIMAL AND TIDAL THEORIES PLANETESIMAL and TIDAL THEORIES
The planetesimal and tidal theories were developed by
Thomas Chamberlin (1843-1928)and Forest Moulton (1872- 1952) during the early 20th century, and James Jeans (1877- 1946) and Harold Jeffreys (1891-1989) in 1918, respectively. In both theories, a star supposedly passed close to the sun. the gravitational pull of the passing star raised tides found on the surface of the sun. some of this erupted matter was detached and plunged into elliptical orbits around the sun. Some of the smaller masses quickly cooled to become solid bodies called planetesimals. Others grew in size because of collision with passing objects in space, eventually forming larger clumps and gathering more and more matter. These theories are also backed up by old meteorites found on Earth, chemically dating back 4.56 billion years---the time approximated to be the formation of the solar system. In both theories, the formation of the planets was explained. At present there are four inner planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars) that are known to be much smaller compared to the other four outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune). Even the physical and chemical properties of these two groups of planets differ immensely. The four outer planets are called gas planets because the are made up of only primary material (helium and hydrogen) that make up the sun. these giants gas planets are believed to have remained gaseous in nature because of their great distance from the sun. the lower temperature, known to be observed beyond the frost line, allowed the condensation of gas, forming a less dense huge planet. On the other hand, the four inner planets are called terrestrial or telluric planets because they have solid surfaces and are mostly of silicate rocks and metals. Earth is one of the inner planets, and as such, it share some common characteristics with the other terrestrial planets.
Explain How Biology Can Be Studied From A Microscopic Approach To Global - Approach. (Indicate The Unifying Themes Where The Study of Biology Is Being - Anchored) .
ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering Rigid Polyurethane Foams From Cardanol Synthesis, Structural Characterization, and Evaluation of Polyol and Foam Properties
Explain How Biology Can Be Studied From A Microscopic Approach To Global - Approach. (Indicate The Unifying Themes Where The Study of Biology Is Being - Anchored) .
ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering Rigid Polyurethane Foams From Cardanol Synthesis, Structural Characterization, and Evaluation of Polyol and Foam Properties